• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Human and ecological risk assessment >Finding fault with health risk assessment: A typology for risk assessment criticism
【24h】

Finding fault with health risk assessment: A typology for risk assessment criticism

机译：发现健康风险评估的缺陷：风险评估批评的类型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although systematic, quantitative assessment of environmental health risks is a staple of regulatory decision-making, complaints regarding its perceived failures and shortcomings are an intrinsic feature of the policy landscape. In this article, we (a) catalog the classic criticisms of conventional health risk assessment, (b) create a typology that orders the critiques according to their focus on either input errors or output biases, and (c) identify selected allegations that fall within each category. We also note that the risk assessment-risk management paradigm has evolved over the past several decades, partially in accordance with the general direction and spirit of these classic critiques. The debate continues today along familiar lines invoking the traditional critiques and rebuttals outlined here.
机译：尽管对环境健康风险进行系统的定量评估是监管决策的主要内容，但有关其感知到的失败和不足的投诉却是政策格局的内在特征。在本文中，我们（a）对常规健康风险评估的经典批评进行分类，（b）创建一种类型学，根据批评者对输入错误或输出偏见的关注程度对评论进行排序，并（c）找出属于该类别的选定指控每个类别。我们还注意到，在过去的几十年中，风险评估-风险管理范式已经发展，部分地符合这些经典批评的总体方向和精神。今天的辩论以熟悉的方式继续进行，援引了这里概述的传统批评和反驳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号