首页> 外文期刊>Human Dimensions of Wildlife >Discourses of Elk Hunting and Grizzly Bear Incidents in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming
【24h】

Discourses of Elk Hunting and Grizzly Bear Incidents in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming

机译:怀俄明州大提顿国家公园的麋鹿狩猎和灰熊事件的论述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Incidents of human-wildlife conflict can solidify participant perspectives and expectations, and reveal underlying social and institutional dynamics. We describe and analyze two incidents of conflict between hunters and grizzly bears in 2011 and 2012. Both incidents were associated with the controversial elk hunt in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. We gathered quotes from opinion-editorials and interviews, categorized quotes according to type, and used cluster analysis to identify discourses and associated coalitions of participants. We examined how participants defined problems, used evidence, and advocated solutions in relation to these incidents. Participant discourses addressed technical and procedural issues of regional wildlife management that extended beyond these incidents, revealing divergent expectations about wildlife management on public lands. Existing decision-making processes dominated by government agencies do not appear to be addressing these expectations. We recommend an integrative, outside appraisal of regional elk management to address conflict and support ecologically sound decision-making that serves common interests.
机译:人与野生生物冲突的事件可以巩固参与者的观点和期望,并揭示潜在的社会和制度动态。我们描述并分析了2011年和2012年猎人与灰熊之间发生的两次冲突事件。这两个事件都与怀俄明州大提顿国家公园的有争议的麋鹿狩猎有关。我们收集了来自舆论编辑和访谈的报价,根据类型对报价进行了分类,并使用聚类分析来确定参与者的话语和相关联。我们研究了参与者如何定义问题,使用证据以及提倡与这些事件有关的解决方案。参与者的论述涉及区域野生动植物管理的技术和程序问题,这些问题超出了这些事件,揭示了人们对公共土地上野生动植物管理的不同期望。由政府机构主导的现有决策过程似乎并未满足这些期望。我们建议对区域麋鹿管理进行外部综合评估,以解决冲突并支持符合共同利益的无害生态决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号