...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Human Resource Development International >Bridging the conference gap: a challenge to enhance the research-practice dialogue
【24h】

Bridging the conference gap: a challenge to enhance the research-practice dialogue

机译：缩小会议差距：加强研究实践对话的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As practitioners, we have the opportunity to attend numerous conferences geared toward practice in OD, HRM and HRD. Instead, in an effort to lead the profession through research we choose to participate in the more academic conferences, such as those sponsored by the Academy of Management and the Academy of Human Resource Development. This year at AHRD in particular, from the pre-conference workshops to the conference symposia and innovative sessions, the Austin conference provided a clarion call to bridge the gap between research and practice. In every session, it seemed that someone touted the reciprocal benefits of the practitioner-researcher relationship. Despite being energized by these academic conferences, we remain frustrated. Our expectation is simple enough. Every year we see great potential for engaging in meaningful dialogue and substantive interaction with fellow practitioners and academic colleagues. Unfortunately, each year it seems that the communication that actually takes place falls short of that potential due to the usual progression of rote conference sessions listening to one-way dissemination of information with little to no opportunity for substantive and meaningful interaction. While we are warmly engaged by our academic colleagues and feel totally welcome and respected as members of the academy, we are nevertheless distanced by the presentation format of research in symposium style. Three questions at the end of forty-five minutes of hurried research presentations or brief comments exchanged while walking from the keynote address to the first symposium of the day do not embody meaningful dialogue and substantive interaction. That said, we offer some suggestions for ways to enhance the research - practice dialogue.
机译：作为从业者，我们有机会参加针对OD，HRM和HRD进行实践的众多会议。相反，为了通过研究引领行业发展，我们选择参加一些学术会议，例如由管理学院和人力资源开发学院赞助的会议。特别是今年的AHRD，从会前讲习班到会议专题讨论会和创新会议，奥斯丁会议发出了号角声，弥合了研究与实践之间的鸿沟。在每节课中，似乎有人吹捧从业者与研究者之间的相互利益。尽管受到这些学术会议的激励，我们仍然感到沮丧。我们的期望很简单。每年我们看到与同业和学术界人士进行有意义的对话和实质性互动的巨大潜力。不幸的是，由于死记硬面的会议通常会听取单向传播的信息，而几乎没有机会进行实质性和有意义的互动，因此似乎每年实际发生的交流都没有达到这种潜力。尽管我们受到学术界同仁的热烈欢迎，并受到学院成员的欢迎和尊重，但我们对研讨会形式的研究报告形式却感到隔distance。从主题演讲到当天的第一场研讨会，在匆忙的研究演讲或简短的评论交换了四十五分钟后，三个问题没有体现出有意义的对话和实质性的互动。也就是说，我们为加强研究提供了一些建议-实践对话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号