• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Human Rights Review >Intervention and the ‘Justice Cascade’: Lessons from the Special Court for Sierra Leone on Prosecution and Civil War
【24h】

Intervention and the ‘Justice Cascade’: Lessons from the Special Court for Sierra Leone on Prosecution and Civil War

机译：干预与“司法梯级”：塞拉利昂问题特别法庭关于起诉和内战的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the ‘Justice Cascade’, Kathryn Sikkink argues that “foreign prosecutions and international tribunals can be cost-effective alternatives to military intervention.” Yet, the successes of the Special Court for Sierra Leone—in prosecuting former Liberian President Charles Taylor and in imposing accountability on the leaders of all armed groups regardless of political alignment—were dependent on a commitment by Western powers and international and regional organizations to a military victory against the rebels in Sierra Leone and coercive regime change in Liberia. The lesson that should be drawn from this case—which parallels that of other international tribunals set up during ongoing violence—is that the prospects for international criminal justice during civil wars are dependent on the political strategies adopted by outsiders to address the conflict and that taking criminal accountability seriously requires an interventionist rather than a consent-based approach to conflict resolution.
机译：凯瑟琳·锡金克（Kathryn Sikkink）在“司法大瀑布”中辩称，“外国起诉和国际法庭可以作为具有成本效益的替代军事干预手段。”然而，塞拉利昂问题特别法庭在起诉利比里亚前总统查尔斯·泰勒和对所有武装团体的领导人实行问责制而不论其政治立场如何上的成功，都取决于西方列强以及国际和区域组织对建立一个独立国家的承诺。反对塞拉利昂叛军的军事胜利和利比里亚的强制政权更迭。从此案中汲取的教训（与在持续暴力期间设立的其他国际法庭的教训类似）是，内战期间国际刑事司法的前景取决于局外人为解决冲突而采取的政治策略，以及刑事责任制严重地要求采取干预措施，而不是基于同意的方式来解决冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号