...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>ICES Journal of Marine Science >International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management
【24h】

International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management

机译：国际上对综合，多部门，生态系统管理方法的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM) has emerged over the past decades, largely to promote biodiversity conservation, and more recently sectoral tradeoffs in the management of marine ecosystems. To ascertain the state of practice of EAM operationalization, a workshop was held, which included a pre-workshop online survey. The survey gauged international participants' perspectives regarding capacity, knowledge, and application of EAM. When asked about the subject, most survey respondents had a general understanding of EAM, and provided a clear definition. Major perceived challenges to EAM objectives by those surveyed included limited knowledge, conflicting interests, insufficient communication, and limited organizational legal frameworks or governance structures. Of those directly involved in an ecosystem approach, the majority responded that processes were in place or developed for application of integrated knowledge toward assessing key issues within their respective sectors (i. e. fisheries, conservation, energy), and that capacity was generally high. Our results show that most respondents, irrespective of sector or geography, see value in considering an integrated, broader ecosystem approach as they manage their sector. Although many participants were from the North Atlantic region, our results suggest that much of the international community is converging toward continued understanding of broad-scale, integrated approaches to marine resource management.
机译：在过去的几十年中，已经出现了生态系统管理方法（EAM），主要是为了促进生物多样性的保护，以及最近在海洋生态系统管理中的部门权衡。为了确定EAM实施的实践状态，举办了一个研讨会，其中包括车间前在线调查。该调查评估了国际参与者关于EAM的能力，知识和应用的观点。当被问及该主题时，大多数调查受访者对EAM都有基本了解，并提供了明确的定义。受访者对EAM目标的主要挑战包括知识有限，利益冲突，沟通不足以及组织法律框架或治理结构有限。在直接参与生态系统方式的那些国家中，大多数人回答说，已经建立或开发了用于应用综合知识来评估其各自部门（即渔业，保护，能源）中的关键问题的程序，而且能力通常很高。我们的结果表明，大多数受访者（无论部门或地理位置如何）在管理其部门时考虑采用综合的，更广泛的生态系统方法的价值。尽管许多参与者来自北大西洋地区，但我们的结果表明，许多国际社会正在朝着继续理解海洋资源管理的大规模，综合方法的方向发展。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ICES Journal of Marine Science》 |2017年第1期|414-420|共7页
  • 作者

    Marshak Anthony R.; Link Jason S.; Shuford Rebecca; Monaco Mark E.; Johannesen Ellen; Bianchi Gabriella; Anderson M. Robin; Olsen Erik; Smith David C.; Schmidt Joern O.; Dickey-Collas Mark;

  • 作者单位

    NOAA, Off Sci & Technol, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, 1315 East West Highway F-ST4, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA;

    NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, 166 Water St, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA;

    NOAA, Off Sci & Technol, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, 1315 East West Highway F-ST4, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA;

    NOAA, Natl Ctr Coastal Ocean Sci, 1305 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA;

    Int Council Explorat Sea, Copenhagen, Denmark;

    Food & Agr Org, Fisheries & Aquaculture Dept, Viale Terme di Caracalla, I-00153 Rome, Italy;

    Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Marine Habitat Div, POB 5667, St John, NF A1C 5X1, Canada;

    Inst Marine Res, PB 1870 Nordnes, N-5817 Bergen, Norway;

    CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia|Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia;

    Univ Kiel, Dept Econ, Wilhelm Seelig Pl 1, D-24118 Kiel, Germany;

    Int Council Explorat Sea, Copenhagen, Denmark|Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Aqua Natl Inst Aquat Resources, Jaegersborg Alle 1, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    ecosystem approach to management; ecosystem-based management; multisector; ocean use; sector tradeoffs;

    机译：生态系统管理方法;基于生态系统的管理;多部门;海洋利用;部门权衡;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号