首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication >Meeting Minutes as a Rhetorical Genre: Discrepancies Between Professional Writing Textbooks and Workplace Practice Tutorial
【24h】

Meeting Minutes as a Rhetorical Genre: Discrepancies Between Professional Writing Textbooks and Workplace Practice Tutorial

机译:会议纪要作为修辞体裁:专业写作教科书和职场实践教程之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Unlike experienced collaborators, student teams often attempt to collaborate without effective documentation of meetings. This tendency may be exacerbated by professional writing textbooks, which rarely mention minutes in their chapters on collaboration and provide ineffective examples of meeting minutes that follow a parliamentary style of minutes rather than the action-oriented style that is the norm in most workplace settings. Interviews with three engineering managers are supported by published research in professional communication to show how meeting minutes are essential to projecting a team forward by solidifying consensus and holding individuals accountable for actions. A short exercise designed to teach students how effective minutes function as a management tool is presented along with observational evidence of the exercise's effect on student team practices in both professional writing and computer science team projects
机译:与经验丰富的协作者不同,学生团队经常尝试在没有有效会议记录的情况下进行协作。专业写作教科书可能会加剧这种趋势,这些教科书很少在会议的章节中提及会议记录,并提供无效的会议记录示例,这些会议记录遵循议会的会议记录风格,而不是大多数工作场所常见的以行动为导向的风格。对三名工程经理的访谈得到了专业交流中已发表研究的支持,以显示会议纪要对于巩固团队共识并让个人对行动负责对预测团队向前发展至关重要。提出了一个简短的练习,旨在教学生有效的会议记录如何有效地作为一种管理工具,以及有关该练习对专业写作和计算机科学团队项目中学生团队实践的影响的观察证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号