首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication >Using criteria in the recommendation report: a case study of the Texas A&M university bonfire commission findings
【24h】

Using criteria in the recommendation report: a case study of the Texas A&M university bonfire commission findings

机译:使用推荐报告中的标准:德克萨斯A&M大学篝火委员会调查结果的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This case study describes classroom use of the decision making criteria contained in a recommendation report for corrective action following the 1999 bonfire accident at Texas A&M University, in which 12 students were killed and 27 were injured during a school-sanctioned activity. The instructional framework introduces criteria as a decision making tool, asks undergraduates to apply simple criteria in a hypothetical situation, outlines the TAMU case, and analyzes the TAMU report's criteria item by item. It also provides guidelines for assessing students' integration of criteria into their own recommendation reports. This case study offers an analytical model not often available to readers outside an organization and introduces undergraduates to a more sophisticated evaluative methodology than most have used in previous writing projects.
机译:该案例研究描述了课堂上使用的建议标准中的决策标准,该建议报告包含在1999年德克萨斯A&M大学篝火事故后的纠正措施中,在该事件中,有12名学生被杀,27名在学校认可的活动中受伤。教学框架引入标准作为决策工具,要求大学生在假设的情况下应用简单的标准,概述TAMU的情况,并逐项分析TAMU报告的标准。它还提供了评估学生将标准整合到他们自己的推荐报告中的指南。该案例研究提供了组织外部的读者通常无法使用的分析模型,并向大学生介绍了比以前的写作项目中大多数使用的更为复杂的评估方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号