首页> 外文期刊>Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on >Publication in professional journals: A survey of editors
【24h】

Publication in professional journals: A survey of editors

机译:在专业期刊上发表:编辑调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Eighty-seven editors of professional journals in engineering and allied scientific fields answered a questionnaire about their journals and the evaluation and publication of material received. The journals focus on basic and applied research, theoretical development, applications, and new developments, with little emphasis on other matters. Supported primarily by subscriptions and page charges, most have part-time editors of whom half receive some payment. Almost all editors use referees, but most do not always accept referees' judgments. AH editors supply instructions for authors. The most common reasons for rejection of material are the subject (not suitable), coverage (questionable significance, too shallow, or questionable validity), and presentation (bad organization or ineffective expression). The most puzzling factors in working with authors relate to suggested changes and to the quality of expression. The most common mistakes are in organization and presentation of material and failure to follow instructions provided. The most common advice is to follow guidelines for manuscripts, write clearly and concisely, and present only material of interest to the reader in a logical sequence with citation of related work.
机译:工程和相关科学领域的专业期刊的八十七位编辑回答了有关其期刊以及所收到材料的评估和出版的问卷。这些期刊侧重于基础和应用研究,理论发展,应用和新发展,而很少强调其他事项。主要由订阅和页面收费提供支持,大多数人都有兼职编辑,其中一半获得了一定的报酬。几乎所有编辑都使用裁判,但是大多数编辑并不总是接受裁判的判断。 AH编辑为作者提供说明。拒绝材料的最常见原因是主题(不合适),覆盖范围(可疑的重要性,过于肤浅或有效性可疑)和表述(不良的组织或无效的表达)。与作者合作时最令人困惑的因素与建议的更改和表达质量有关。最常见的错误是材料的组织和表述以及未能遵循提供的说明。最常见的建议是遵循手稿指南,写得简洁明了,并在引用相关工作的同时按逻辑顺序向读者展示感兴趣的材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号