首页> 外文期刊>IEEJ energy journal >The Case for a Low Carbon Tax
【24h】

The Case for a Low Carbon Tax

机译:低碳税的理由

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Conventional wisdom in the climate debate is that a high price on carbon is necessary as a central feature of climate policy. The underlying logic is that people need to feel a price signal in order to change their behaviors and to motivate political decision making leading to deep decarbonization. Of course, people do respond to energy price signals, in some cases in the form of political action against those who increased energy prices, such was the case among the gilets jaunes (yellow vests) protesters in France. Despite ample research and real-world evidence against the prospects of establishing high carbon prices, conventional climate policy discussions have stubbornly refused to consider alternative approaches to high carbon prices. In this essay I outline the case for a low-and-rising carbon price, one that is consistent with political realities and that seeks to avoid unintended policy consequences.
机译:在气候辩论中,传统观点认为,高碳价是气候政策的核心特征。潜在的逻辑是,人们需要感受到价格信号,才能改变自己的行为并激发政治决策,从而导致深度脱碳。当然,人们的确对能源价格信号做出反应,在某些情况下以对付提高能源价格的人采取政治行动的形式进行,例如法国的马甲(黄背心)抗议者就是这种情况。尽管有足够的研究和现实证据反对建立高碳价的前景,但传统的气候政策讨论仍然顽固地拒绝考虑替代高碳价的方法。在本文中,我概述了低碳价格上涨的情况,这种价格与政治现实是一致的,旨在避免意外的政策后果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《IEEJ energy journal》 |2019年第novaspeca期|76-79|共4页
  • 作者

    Roger Pielke Jr;

  • 作者单位

    Environmental Studies Program University of Colorado Boulder US;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号