首页> 外文期刊>IEEJ energy journal >Energy Intensity Of Gdp As An Index Of Energy Conservation: Problems In International Comparison Of Energy Intensity Of Gdp And Estimate Using Sector-based Approach
【24h】

Energy Intensity Of Gdp As An Index Of Energy Conservation: Problems In International Comparison Of Energy Intensity Of Gdp And Estimate Using Sector-based Approach

机译:国内生产总值的能源强度作为节能的指标:国际比较国内生产总值的能源强度和使用基于部门的方法进行估算的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Internationally, we are more interested in energy conservation. Behind this background are soaring energy prices and global warming. Japan is said to be the most advanced country with regard to energy conservation, and its energy-reduction technology is highly evaluated. The most eminent example of this is the energy intensity of GDP (gross domestic product) or energy consumption per GDP. Energy intensity of GDP is easy to calculate and is often used as an energy-conservation index for a country. Comparing energy intensity internationally, you will know while that of the U.S. is 1.7 times as large as that of Japan, that of China and India, where energy demand is increasing, is 6.2 times and 4.5 times larger, respectively, highlighting their large potential for energy conservation. However, if you calculate it by GDP converted to purchasing power parity, China's energy intensity is reduced to 1.3 times as large as that of Japan, and that of India is 0.7 times as large as that of Japan, showing that India is a better energy-saving country than Japan. f energy intensity.
机译:在国际上,我们对节能更加感兴趣。这种背景的背后是能源价格飞涨和全球变暖。据说日本是节能方面最先进的国家,其节能技术得到了高度评​​价。最突出的例子是GDP的能源强度(国内生产总值)或每GDP的能源消耗。 GDP的能源强度易于计算,通常用作一个国家的节能指标。在国际上比较能源强度,您会知道,美国的能源强度是日本的1.7倍,而能源需求不断增长的中国和印度的能源强度分别是日本的6.2倍和4.5倍,突出显示了美国的能源潜力巨大节能减排。但是,如果将GDP换算为购买力平价来计算,中国的能源强度将降低到日本的1.3倍,印度的能源强度将是日本的0.7倍,这表明印度是一个更好的能源省的国家要比日本大。 f能量强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号