...
首页> 外文期刊>International review of intellectual property and competition law >MusicMatic - The French Supreme Court's Decision on Creative Commons Plus (CC+) Commercial Licensing and Mandatory Collective Management of the Right to Remuneration for Communication to the Public of Commercial Phonograms
【24h】

MusicMatic - The French Supreme Court's Decision on Creative Commons Plus (CC+) Commercial Licensing and Mandatory Collective Management of the Right to Remuneration for Communication to the Public of Commercial Phonograms

机译:Musicmatic - 法国最高法院对创意公众的决定(CC +)商业许可和强制性集体管理对公众沟通的薪酬权的权利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The French Supreme Court established that businesses using on their premises devices provided by third parties for making background music are per-forming an act of communication to the public in the sense of Art. L214-1 of the French Intellectual Property Code (CPI). The Court qualified commercially licensed phonograms, also published under Creative Commons non-commercial licences (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) on the Jamendo online platform, as "phonograms published for commercial purposes". According to the Court, the right to remuneration for communication to the public of phonograms published for commercial purposes cannot be contractually waived by performers. The right to remuneration is subject to mandatory management by a collective management organisation (CMO) regardless of whether rightholders have explicitly contractually entrusted the exercise of their rights to the CMO. Mandatory collective management of the right to remuneration for communication to the public of phonograms published for commercial purposes is compatible with EU law. The Supreme Court declined to refer the question of the compatibility of mandatory collective management to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), considering that the law is sufficiently clear in this regard.
机译:法国最高法院设立了在艺术意义上每次构成与公众的第三方提供的第三方提供的房屋设备的业务。法国知识产权代码(CPI)的L214-1。法院合格资格商业许可的唱片,也在Jamendo在线平台上的创意公共许可证(CC By-Nc-Nd 3.0)下发表,如商业目的的“发表的唱片线”。据法院称,履行向公众发表商业目的公众的报酬的权利不能通过表演者合同免除。薪酬权受到集体管理组织(CMO)的强制性管理,无论右舷师是否已明确缔约方会委托他们对CMO的权利。强制集体管理对向商业目的公布的录音机公众沟通的薪酬权的权利与欧盟法律兼容。最高法院拒绝将强制性集体管理兼容性兼容欧盟(CJEU)法院的兼容性,考虑到法律在这方面足够明确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号