'Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha and Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift Europe' Decision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 25 July 2018 - Case No. C-129/17

首页> 外文期刊>International review of intellectual property and competition law >'Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha and Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift Europe' Decision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 25 July 2018 - Case No. C-129/17

【24h】

'Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha and Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift Europe' Decision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 25 July 2018 - Case No. C-129/17

机译：'MITSUBISHI SHOJI KAISHA和三菱卡特彼勒叉车欧洲司法法院的决定2018年7月25日 - 案例C-129/17

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

1.Article 5 of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/ 2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a mark is entitled to oppose a third party, without its consent, removing all the signs identical to that mark and affixing other signs on products placed in the customs warehouse, as in the main proceedings, with a view to importing them or trading them in the European Economic Area (EEA) where they have never yet been marketed.

机译：1. 2008年10月22日的指令2008/95 / 9 / EC的第5次和2008年10月22日的理事会，近似与商标有关的成员国的法律和理事会条例第9条（EC）第207/2009期2009年2月在欧洲联盟商标上的意思被解释为意义，即标记的所有者有权反对第三方，未经其同意，将所有与该标记相同的迹象删除和贴上海关仓库中的产品的其他迹象，如在主要程序中，以期在欧洲经济区（EEA）中进口或交易他们从未销售的地方。

著录项

来源
《International review of intellectual property and competition law》 |2019年第3期|390-390|共1页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
European Economic Area (EEA); Removal of identical signs by a third party; Affixation of new signs; Opposition; Consent; Proprietor of a mark;

机译：欧洲经济区（EEA）;第三方去除相同的迹象;新标志的附加;反对;同意;标记的所有者;

相似文献

外文文献

1. 'Confederation paysanne and Others' Decision of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 25 July 2018 - Case No. C-528/16 [J] . International review of intellectual property and competition law . 2019,第2期

机译：2018年7月25日欧洲司法法院（大会）的“联合会薪酬和其他人”决定 - 案例编号C-528/16
2. 'Boston Scientific': Decision of the European Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) 25 October 2018 - Case No. C-527/17 [J] . International review of intellectual property and competition law . 2019,第5期

机译：'波士顿科学'：欧洲司法法院的决定2018年10月25日 - 案例编号C-527/17
3. 'SNB-REACT' Decision of the European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) 7 August 2018 - Case No. C-521/17 [J] . International review of intellectual property and competition law . 2019,第2期

机译：2018年8月7日欧洲司法法院（第三次）的“SNB-React”决定 - 案例No.C-521/17
4. Recent Decisions of the European Court of Justice of the European Union on Supplementary Protection Certificates: A Few Answers—Many Questions [O] . Dr. Franz-Josef Zimmer, Dr. Benjamin Quest, Dr. Markus Grammel -1

机译：欧洲联盟欧洲法院关于补充保护证书的最新决定：几个答案—许多问题
5. O conceito de ação pendente no artigo 15.º do Regulamento (CE) n.º 1346/2000 relativo aos processos de insolvência: comentário ao acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça da União Europeia de 6 de junho de 2018, Tarragó da Silveira, proc. C-250/17, ecli:eu:c:2018:398 = The concept of pending lawsuit in article 15 of Regulation (EC) no 1346/2000 on insolvency proceedings: annotation on the European Court of Justice Judgment of 6 june 2018, Tarragó da Silveira, Case c-250/17, ecli:eu:c:2018:398 [O] . Luís de Lima Pinheiro, João Gomes de Almeida 2019

机译：法规第15条（EC）第15条的行动概念（EC）在破产诉讼程序中没有1346/2000：评论2018年6月6日司法法院的判决，TarragódaIleveira，Proc。 C-250/17，Ecli：欧盟：C：2018：398 =在监管第15条（EC）第15条上待诉讼的概念（EC）No.1346/2000关于破产程序：欧洲司法法院审判2018年6月6日的审判， TarragóDaIleveira，案例C-250/17，Ecli：欧盟：C：2018：398

'Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha and Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift Europe' Decision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 25 July 2018 - Case No. C-129/17

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅