...
首页> 外文期刊>IIC:International review of intellectual property and competition law >'EF-G - Central Attack' Decision of the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland (Bundesgericht) 5 August 2020 - Case No. 4A_97/2020
【24h】

'EF-G - Central Attack' Decision of the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland (Bundesgericht) 5 August 2020 - Case No. 4A_97/2020

机译:“EF-G - 中央攻击”瑞士联邦最高法院的决定(Bundesgicht)8月5日8月5日 - 案例第4A -97 / 2020

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1. The concept of "legal interest" as follows from Art. 52 TMA must be understood broadly and does not exclude the consideration of a de facto interest; like Art. 59(2)(a) of the CCP, Art. 52 TMA in fact enshrines the requirement of an interest in the specific decision worthy of protection. 2. Such an interest exists when there is uncertainty as to the legal relationship between the parties, when a finding concerning the existence and purpose of the legal relationship could eliminate this uncertainty and when its persistence hinders the plaintiff's freedom of decision to the point of becoming unbearable. 3. The criterion of an interest worthy of protection is subject to less stringent requirements for an action for invalidation than for other actions for a declaratory judgement, whether positive or negative. 4. Even if parties do not compete on Swiss territory (e.g. by not distributing any products related to the trade mark in Switzerland), they have a real (concrete) interest in bringing an action for invalidity of a (basic) Swiss trade mark before a Swiss civil court as it is only in this way that they can benefit from the effects of the "central attack" provided for by the Madrid System. The admission of such an action will have a direct effect on disputes between the parties in the countries designated by the defendant's international registration. 5. The mechanism of the "central attack" has been set up precisely to allow, independently of possible actions taken abroad, the invalidation of the international registration and, indirectly, to eliminate the national trade marks (or the national procedures) resulting therefrom in the countries designated by the trade mark owner. 6. The fact that "the proceedings are always pending before offices and not courts" is not decisive, since if the "central attack" is successful in the country of origin, all trade marks filed or registered in the countries designated by the international registration are invalidated, regardless of whether they are the subject of judicial or administrative proceedings before the foreign national office.
机译:1.“法律利益”的概念如艺术所遵循的。必须广泛地理解52 TMA,并不排除考虑事实上的兴趣;喜欢艺术。 59(2)(a)中共,艺术。事实上,52 TMA制定了对有价值的特定决策的兴趣要求。 2.当各方之间的法律关系存在不确定性时,当事人的法律关系存在不确定性时,当有关法律关系的存在和目的时可以消除这种不确定性,当其持久性阻碍原告的决定自由时难以忍受。 3.值得保护的兴趣标准是对无效的行动的严格要求,而不是宣言判决的其他行动,无论是积极还是负面。 4.即使缔约方没有竞争瑞士领土(例如,通过未分发与瑞士的商标有关的任何产品),他们都有一个真实(具体)兴趣在之前为(基本)瑞士商标的无效行为瑞士民间法院只是通过这种方式,他们可以从马德里系统提供的“中央袭击”的影响中受益。承认这种行动将直接影响被告国际注册所指定国家各方之间的争端。 5.“中央攻击”的机制已经准确地设立,允许独立于国外的可能行动,国际登记的无效,间接地消除由此产生的国家商标(或国家程序)由商标所有者指定的国家。 6.“诉讼程序始终待在办公室前待院”的事实并不决定,因为“中央攻击”在原产国成功,所有商标在国际注册所指定的国家/地区提起或注册无论它们是外国人办事处之前是否是司法或行政诉讼的主题无效。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号