首页> 外文期刊>In-Plant Printer >Head-to-Head on Outsourcing
【24h】

Head-to-Head on Outsourcing

机译:外包对决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Don't think for one minute that In-Plant Printer is afraid to plunge into treacherous waters to bring our readers hard-hitting, to-the-point editorial! For the pages that follow, once again, we braved the perilous outsourcing region of the ocean of issues we call in-plant printing. To explore these territories, we've brought together a couple of sharks (and, they are somewhat territorial): Jack Klasnic (JK), our own fearless Consultant's Corner contributor and long-time expert consultant in all things in-plant, sails forth to confront William C. Lamparter (WL), also a printing consultant who dwells more often in the ports of the commercial printing world. Although not inexorably anti-in-plant, Lamparter generally will take the position that the circumstances and conditions that validate an in-plant's existence rarely present themselves. He maintains that print-purchasing wisdom is largely what is lacking for in-plants. Klasnic concedes that there are many in-plants that fail to operate cost-effectively and that need to better optimize their facilities and workloads. He is clear, however, about the benefits in-plants typically offer their parent companies. Klasnic allows that outsourcing, to a reasonable degree, is absolutely necessary.
机译:一分钟内不要认为In-Plant Printer会害怕陷入险恶的境地,以带给我们的读者精打细算的直截了当的社论!在接下来的页面中,我们再次冒着危险的外包领域-我们称之为厂内印刷的问题。为了探索这些领域,我们汇集了一些鲨鱼(而且它们在一定程度上是区域性的):Jack Klasnic(JK),我们自己无所畏惧的顾问角贡献者,并且是工厂内所有事情的长期专家顾问,扬帆起航与威廉·C·兰帕特(WL)面对面,后者也是印刷顾问,他经常居住在商业印刷界。尽管不是不可避免地存在于工厂中,但Lamparter通常会采取这样的立场,即证明工厂中存在的情况和条件很少出现。他坚持认为,购买印刷品的智慧很大程度上是工厂内所缺乏的。 Klasnic承认,许多工厂内部无法以成本效益的方式运营,并且需要更好地优化其设施和工作量。但是,他很清楚工厂通常会为其母公司带来的好处。 Klasnic允许在一定程度上外包是绝对必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号