• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial marketing management >The up- and downside of collaboration in core and non-core technologies -Selective, contingent, and orchestrated openness in R&D collaborations
【24h】

The up- and downside of collaboration in core and non-core technologies -Selective, contingent, and orchestrated openness in R&D collaborations

机译：R＆D合作中的核心和非核心技术合作的上行和缺点 - 在研发合作中的协作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper contributes to the current debate about the ?knowledge sharing-protecting? tension in R&D collaborations by introducing a new angle for analyzing this paradox. Considering the role of internal knowledge sources of the firm, the paper introduces and empirically analyses the interplay between three knowledge governance mechanisms (selective, contingent, and orchestrated openness) and the different technological fields of the firm (core, related non-core, and distant non-core technologies). Based on a unique first-hand large-scale project-level dataset from a Global 100 firm across a 10-year span, this research finds that R&D collaborations selectively conducted in firm?s related non-core technological fields promise the best innovation performance. Further, by orchestrating its projects across core and non-core technological fields in the same knowledge portfolio, the firm can leverage a network of inter-connected projects when collaborating with external partners. As such, the firm can strategically ?distribute? collaboration risks across multiple projects, while optimize its access to external knowledge that it intends to get. Finally, contrary to the common assumption, this study does not find any discriminating factors against market-based partners in their contribution to innovation in both core and non-core technologies.
机译：本文有助于当前关于该知识共享保护的辩论？通过引入分析这一悖论的新角度来张力研发协作。考虑到公司内部知识来源的作用，本文介绍并经验分析了三个知识治理机制（选择性，偶然和策划开放）与公司（核心，相关非核心）的不同技术领域之间的相互作用遥远的非核心技术）。该研究基于全球100家公司的独特大型项目级数据集，该研究发现，在公司相关非核心技术领域有选择地进行的研发协作承诺最佳创新性能。此外，通过在同一知识组合中跨核心和非核心技术领域进行协调，该公司可以在与外部合作伙伴合作时利用连接的网络网络。因此，该公司可以战略性地？分发？多个项目的协作风险，同时优化其对其打算获得的外部知识的访问。最后，与共同的假设相反，本研究没有找到针对核心和非核心技术的创新贡献的任何歧视因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号