首页> 外文期刊>Info >Clash of cultures - integrating copyright and consumer law
【24h】

Clash of cultures - integrating copyright and consumer law

机译:文化冲突-整合版权法和消费者法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This article seeks to deal with the fundamental conceptual differences between consumer law and copyright law that render the application of consumer law to copyright-law related conflicts difficult.sign/methodology/approach - Following a normative approach to copyright and consumer law based on an analysis of the relevant literature and case law, the article examines in which situations consumers encounter obstacles when trying to rely on consumer law to invoke "privileges" granted to them under copyright law, such as the private copying exception. Findings - Research shows that most difficulties lie in the fundamental  conceptual differences  between consumer law and copyright law regarding the objectives and beneficiaries of each regime, as well as diverging conceptions of "property", "user rights" and "internal market". Such discrepancies undeniably follow from the fact that each regime traditionally never had to deal with each other's concerns: consumers never played a role in copyright law, whereas copyright protected works were not seen as consumer goods. Originality/value - By identifying the main conceptual differences between the two legal regimes, the article contributes in an inter-disciplinary manner to the discussion on the place of the digital consumer under European law.
机译:目的-本文旨在解决消费者法与版权法之间的基本概念差异,从而使消费者法适用于与版权法相关的冲突(标志,方法/方法)-遵循基于版权和消费者法的规范方法通过对相关文献和判例法的分析,本文考察了在某些情况下,消费者在试图依靠消费者法来援引版权法赋予他们的“特权”时遇到的障碍,例如私人复制例外。研究结果表明,大多数困难在于关于每个制度的目标和受益人的消费者法和版权法之间的根本“概念差异”,以及“财产”,“用户权利”和“内部市场”的不同概念。这种差异无可否认地源于以下事实:传统上,每个制度都不必处理彼此的担忧:消费者从未在版权法中发挥作用,而受版权保护的作品却不被视为消费品。原创性/价值-通过确定两种法律制度之间的主要概念差异,本文以一种跨学科的方式为讨论欧洲法律下的数字消费者的地位做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号