首页> 外文期刊>Information and organization >Sociomateriality - taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch
【24h】

Sociomateriality - taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch

机译:社会重要性-走错了路?对很多的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In responding to Mutch's (2013) commentary on sociomateriality, our aim is to reassert a well-established tradition of plurality in theoretical approaches in information systems and organization research. We challenge his critique by proxy and exclusionary discourse in favour of identifying commonalities and mutuality among theories that explore subtle realism. Further, we maintain that ruling out novel perspectives and stifling innovation is likely to undermine any field of study. If there is a measure of healthy scholarship then it is surely our capacity to sustain the conditions that foster openness and experimentation in the framing and doing of our research endeavors.
机译:在回应Mutch(2013)对社会物质性的评论时,我们的目的是在信息系统和组织研究的理论方法上重申一个已确立的多元传统。我们通过代理和排他性话语来挑战他的批评,以期在探索微妙现实主义的理论之间找出共同点和共同点。此外,我们认为排除新颖观点和扼杀创新可能会破坏任何研究领域。如果有一个健康的学术措施,那么我们肯定有能力维持条件,在我们的研究工作框架和工作中促进开放性和实验性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Information and organization》 |2013年第2期|77-80|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Information Systems and Innovation Group, Department of Management, The London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom;

    Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 100 Main Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号