• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >Explicit terror prevention versus vague civil liberty: how the UK broadcasting news (de)legitimatise online mass surveillance since Edward Snowden's revelations
【24h】

Explicit terror prevention versus vague civil liberty: how the UK broadcasting news (de)legitimatise online mass surveillance since Edward Snowden's revelations

机译：明确的恐怖预防与模糊的公民自由：自爱德华·斯诺登（Edward Snowden）的启示以来，英国广播新闻（de）合法化在线大规模监视

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Snowden's initial revelations aimed at establishing a public debate on online surveillance informed through the media. Media should serve the public's need for information and offer various viewpoints and sources to enhance public debates. This study assesses how online surveillance is justified or countered in British broadcast news since the 2013 Snowden revelations for five selected major events in news coverage ending with the Charlie Hebdo aftermath in Paris in early 2015. The critical discourse analysis shows that UK broadcasts cover justification and delegitimation arguments of online surveillance. Online surveillance legitimation combines rationalisation (terror prevention) and moral evaluation (public security) arguments, which are often expressed by governmental actors. The broadcast discourse tends to give governmental, pro-surveillance actors a voice by default. The detailedness of terror threat descriptions increases over time. In 2013, 'terrorist attacks' are rather factually mentioned. In 2015, several ways leading to a loss of lives through terror are explicitly stated, which strengthens the instrumental rationality legitimation arguments. Delegitimising arguments predominantly use moralising and mythopoetic arguments (civil liberties) that are expressed by Snowden himself or politicians, yet rarely by non-governmental organisations, and very rarely by citizens. It is harder for non-governmental actors to continuously interpret the broadcast discourse. Therefore, what exactly is at stake when online mass surveillance increases remains obscure in the news discourse. The surveillance discourse should be richer in order to give the audience a chance to understand the vague and less tangible contra-surveillance arguments better.
机译：斯诺登（Snowden）最初的启示旨在就通过媒体提供的有关在线监控的公开辩论进行讨论。媒体应满足公众对信息的需求，并提供各种观点和资源来加强公众辩论。这项研究评估了自2013年斯诺登（Snowden）揭露的新闻报道中精选的五个重大事件以来的在线监视是如何合理化或反击的，这些事件以2015年初在巴黎的查理周刊（Charlie Hebdo）余波结束。在线监视的合法化论点。在线监视合法性结合了合理化（预防恐怖）和道德评估（公共安全）论据，这些论点通常由政府行为者表达。默认情况下，广播话语往往会给政府，支持监视的参与者一个声音。恐怖威胁描述的详细程度会随着时间的流逝而增加。在2013年，实际上提到了“恐怖袭击”。 2015年，明确提出了几种通过恐怖活动导致人员伤亡的方法，这些方法加强了工具理性合法性的论点。将合法化的论点主要使用斯诺登本人或政客表达的道德和神话般的论点（公民自由），但很少由非政府组织表达，而很少由公民表达。非政府行为者很难连续地解释广播话语。因此，在新闻报道中，当网络大规模监视增加时，确切处于危险之中的是。监视话语应更丰富，以使听众有机会更好地理解模糊和不真实的反监视论据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号