• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >Money machines: electronic financial technologies, distancing, and responsibility in global finance
【24h】

Money machines: electronic financial technologies, distancing, and responsibility in global finance

机译：货币机器：电子金融技术，距离和全球金融责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When I was asked to review Coeckelbergh's last book, I first declined the offer. My reasons were many: I am not a philosopher, I am not familiar with current discourses in philosophy, and I am not into electronic technologies. I am an applied researcher, a sociologist of consumption specialising in debt- and payment problems among households, with a particular interest for the financialisation of everyday life. It did not help much: would I do it anyway? So I accepted. Given my academic baggage, I will do it, not from the point of view of philosophy, but from the standpoint of the political economy. I thereby address two of Coeckelbergh's main aims: (i) contributing to a better understanding of the moral and social implications of financial technologies; and (ii) help defining under which conditions more responsible financial practices are possible (p. 4). With the financial crisis still ravaging the lives of households across the world, it is undoubtedly a matter of urgency. So does Coeckel-bergh succeed?
机译：当我被要求审查科克伯格的最新著作时，我首先拒绝了这一提议。我的理由有很多：我不是哲学家，我对当前的哲学论述不熟悉，也不熟悉电子技术。我是一名应用研究人员，是一名消费社会学家，专门研究家庭之间的债务和支付问题，并对日常生活的金融化特别感兴趣。并没有太大帮助：我还是会这样做吗？所以我接受了。考虑到我的学术包,，我将这样做，而不是从哲学的角度，而是从政治经济学的角度。因此，我要谈谈Coeckelbergh的两个主要目标：（i）有助于更好地理解金融技术的道德和社会影响； （ii）帮助定义在哪些条件下可以采取更负责任的财务惯例（第4页）。由于金融危机仍在困扰着世界各地的家庭，毫无疑问，这是一个紧迫问题。那么，科克伯格成功了吗？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号