...
首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >The myth of 'us': digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity
【24h】

The myth of 'us': digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity

机译:“我们”的神话:数字网络,政治变革和集体生产

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines critically the claims that digital networks (digital media infrastructures, especially social media platforms) fundamentally change the conditions of politics over the longer term. Without doubt digital networks enable faster political mobilization, accelerated 6ycles of action, and some new forms of collectivity, but how consequential is this in the longer term when set alongside other longer term consequences of a digitally saturated environment? The author argues that some leading accounts of digital media's contributions to political change operate with a thin account of the social, the sort of thin account that historically has been supplemented by media's mythical accounts over the past century of their role in supplying social knowledge. In the digital age, even the most detailed and rigorous accounts of digital networks' contributions to political action (Bennett & Segerberg, 2012, 2013) fail to show that those networks also facilitate longer term political action that builds longer term political transformations: arguably, the resulting acceleration of action encourages short-term loyalties and less stability in political socialization. However, this limitation of existing accounts tends to be masked by a new myth for the age of digital networks: the myth of 'us', which encourages us to believe that our gatherings on social media platforms are a natural form of expressive collectivity, even though it is exactly that belief that is at the basis of such platforms' creation of economic value. The article deconstructs that myth, as the starting point for more satisfactory future accounts of digital networks' possible contributions to political change.
机译:本文严格审查了数字网络(数字媒体基础设施,尤其是社交媒体平台)从长远来看从根本上改变政治条件的说法。毫无疑问,数字网络可以促进更快的政治动员,加速的行动周期和某些新的集体形式,但是从长远来看,这与数字饱和环境带来的其他长期后果相比有何后果?作者认为,一些数字媒体对政治变革的贡献的主要叙述是对社会的一种稀疏报道,这种稀薄的报道在过去的一个世纪中被媒体在提供社会知识方面的神话神话所补充。在数字时代,即使是最详细,最严格的数字网络对政治行动的贡献(Bennett&Segerberg,2012,2013)也未能表明,这些网络也促进了长期的政治行动,从而建立了长期的政治变革:随之而来的行动的加速鼓励了短期的忠诚度和政治社会化过程中的不稳定。但是,现有帐户的这种局限性往往会被数字网络时代的新神话所掩盖:“我们”的神话,这促使我们相信,社交媒体平台上的聚会是表达集体的自然形式,甚至尽管正是这种平台创造经济价值的基础正是这种信念。这篇文章解构了这个神话,作为更令人满意的未来数字网络对政治变革的可能贡献的起点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号