...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >The song of the sirens: Google Books Project and copyright in a digital age
【24h】

The song of the sirens: Google Books Project and copyright in a digital age

机译：警笛之歌：Google图书计划和数字时代的版权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Numerous scholars have highlighted the extraordinary book-scanning project created by Google in 2004. The project aims to create a digital full-text search index which would provide people with online access to books and assist research. A few months after the original idea started being implemented, the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers filed a class-action lawsuit, claiming that the Google Books Project violated copyright law in the United States. The Google Books Project radically changed its character from the time of its birth until the negotiation of an Amended Settlement Agreement (ASA) with the plaintiffs. It has raised serious controversies not only regarding different aspects of the future of the Internet but also over the issue of privatization of knowledge. Those in favour of the initiative highlight the astonishing accomplishment of Google, allowing us to access books more easily than ever before in human history. However, their claim is as dangerous as the song of the sirens. While at first sight Google tells a tale of extraordinary inclusion, it excludes those who cannot pay to access snippets or limited view of around 80% of the books available. We also discuss the ASA of Google with the Authors Guild and its failure on March 2011. Finally, we explore the concept of fair use', or exceptions and limitations on copyright', which provides for full access to books to any individual, library or archive as long as they are used for educational or scientific purposes.
机译：许多学者都强调了Google在2004年创建的非凡的图书扫描项目。该项目旨在创建数字全文搜索索引，该索引将使人们能够在线访问书籍并协助研究。最初的想法开始实施后的几个月，美国作家协会和美国出版商协会提起了集体诉讼，声称Google图书计划违反了美国的版权法。 Google图书计划从诞生之日起到与原告就修订后的和解协议（ASA）进行谈判以来，从根本上改变了其性格。它不仅在互联网的未来的不同方面，而且在知识私有化的问题上都引起了严重的争议。那些支持该计划的人强调了Google的惊人成就，这使我们比人类历史上任何时候都更容易访问书籍。但是，他们的要求与警笛声一样危险。乍看之下，Google讲述了一个非凡的包容性故事，但它排除了那些无法付费阅读摘录或对80％的可用书籍视线有限的人。我们还将在2011年3月与作者协会讨论Google的ASA及其失败。最后，我们探讨“合理使用”或“版权的例外与限制”的概念，该概念使个人，图书馆或存档，只要它们用于教育或科学目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号