...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >Why privacy keeps dying: the trouble with talk about the end of privacy
【24h】

Why privacy keeps dying: the trouble with talk about the end of privacy

机译：为什么隐私会不断消失：谈论隐私终结的麻烦

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is a curious fact how much talk about privacy is about the end of privacy. We term this 'privacy endism,' locating the phenomenon within a broader category of endist thought. We then analyze 101 newspaper articles between 1990 and 2012 that declare the end of privacy. Three findings follow. First, claims about the end of privacy point to an unusually broad range of technological and institutional causes. Privacy has been pronounced defunct for decades, but there has never been a near consensus about its causes. Second, unlike other endist talk (the end of art or history, etc.), privacy endism appears ongoing and not period specific. Finally, our explanation of the persistence and idiosyncrasy of claims to the end of privacy focuses on Warren and Brandeis's 1890 negative conception of privacy as 'the right to be let alone': namely, modern privacy talk has always been endist because the right to privacy was born out of the conditions for its violation, not its realization. The conclusion comments on implications of that basic proposition.
机译：一个奇怪的事实是，关于隐私的讨论多少与隐私的终结有关。我们称这种“隐私倾向主义”为现象，将其定位在广义的倾向主义思想中。然后，我们分析了1990年至2012年之间101篇宣布隐私权终止的报纸文章。以下是三个发现。首先，关于隐私保护终止的主张指向异常广泛的技术和制度原因。几十年来，隐私已被宣布为废止，但对于其原因，从来没有达成共识。其次，与其他端庄主义言论（艺术或历史的终结等）不同，隐私端倪似乎是持续存在的，而不是特定时期的。最后，我们对要求保护隐私的持久性和特质性的解释集中在沃伦和布兰代斯在1890年提出的否定隐私的消极概念：“更不用说权利了”：也就是说，现代隐私讨论一直存在，因为隐私权是出于违规而不是实现的条件而诞生的。结论评论了该基本主张的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号