• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >Privacy nudges as policy interventions: comparing US and German media users' evaluation of information privacy nudges
【24h】

Privacy nudges as policy interventions: comparing US and German media users' evaluation of information privacy nudges

机译：隐私推动作为政策干预措施：比较美国和德国媒体用户对信息隐私推动的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The protection of individuals' online privacy is one of the main challenges for Internet policy. As the informed consent paradigm has largely failed to ensure privacy protection online, we examine nudging as a tool of soft paternalism as an alternative intervention to sensitize users towards online privacy. Building upon the criticism that nudging is considered being manipulative and reducing people's autonomy in decision-making, we inquire how media users themselves evaluate nudges' effectiveness and intrusiveness. In particular, we distinguish nudges either as targeting heuristic decision-making (system 1) or deliberate decision-making through education and information (system 2). Empirically, we carried out an interview study among German and US media users (N=52) to address cross-cultural differences in the evaluation of privacy interventions. Our results point to a preference for system 2 nudges. Germans in particular perceive state interventions addressing privacy awareness as more acceptable and helpful than US participants.
机译：保护个人的在线隐私是互联网政策的主要挑战之一。由于知情同意范式在很大程度上未能确保在线隐私保护，因此我们将推n作为软性家长主义的一种工具，作为使用户对在线隐私敏感的另一种干预措施。在批评指轻推被认为是操纵性的行为并减少人们在决策中的自主性的批评的基础上，我们询问媒体用户自己如何评价轻推的有效性和侵入性。特别是，我们区分微调是针对启发式决策（系统1）还是通过教育和信息进行故意决策（系统2）。根据经验，我们在德国和美国媒体用户（N = 52）中进行了一项访谈研究，以解决隐私干预措施评估中的跨文化差异。我们的结果表明偏爱系统2微调。特别是德国人认为，与美国参与者相比，解决隐私意识的州干预更为容易接受和帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号