...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Information development >Evaluation of h and h-type Indices for Research Performance at Researcher's Level
【24h】

Evaluation of h and h-type Indices for Research Performance at Researcher's Level

机译：在研究人员水平上评估h和h型指标的研究绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Various new performance evaluation indices for impact have been proposed and studied in various contexts. This study carried out a quantitative evaluation of the case of Malaysian engineering researchers at the micro level using a scientometric approach. In order to understand the behavior of new developments, a comparative performance evaluation is carried out of h-index, a set of h-type indices along with publication and citation metrics. Findings are compared with earlier major studies. We looked for institutional h-index and researchers' h-index scores and did not find any relationship. Exploratory Factor Analysis is employed to examine the valid categorization and to study the underlying dimensions of the studied metrics and indices. The inter-correlation among h-index, its variants, and traditional metrics is probed in detail. The h, q and g-indices along with publication and citation hold the position on quantity of the productive core', while the R index showed equal loading on both cores. For the case of Malaysian engineering researchers, two conspicuous findings are observed about the total citation and g-index. These have association with the first component named as quantity of the productive core.' Our findings strengthen the point that citation count has a strong association with the quantity of the productive core' and cannot be used as sole impact evaluation measure.
机译：在各种情况下，已经提出并研究了各种新的影响力绩效评估指标。这项研究使用科学计量方法从微观层面对马来西亚工程研究人员的案例进行了定量评估。为了了解新事物的行为，对h指数，一组h型指数以及发布和引用指标进行了比较性能评估。研究结果与早期的主要研究进行了比较。我们寻找机构的h指数和研究人员的h指数得分，但没有发现任何关系。探索性因素分析用于检查有效的分类并研究所研究指标和指标的基本维度。详细探讨了h索引，其变体和传统指标之间的相互关系。 h，q和g指数以及出版物和引文在生产核心数量上的位置保持不变，而R指数显示两个核心上的负载相等。对于马来西亚工程研究人员而言，关于总引文和g指数观察到两个明显的发现。这些与第一个被称为生产核心数量的成分相关。我们的发现加强了以下观点：引用计数与生产核心的数量密切相关，不能用作唯一的影响评估手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号