...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Information and software technology >Ontological and linguistic metamodelling revisited: A language use approach
【24h】

Ontological and linguistic metamodelling revisited: A language use approach

机译：本体论和语言元模型再探：一种语言使用方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although metamodelling is generally accepted as important for our understanding of software and systems development, arguments about the validity and utility of ontological versus linguistic metamodelling continue. Objective: The paper examines the traditional, metamodel-focused construction of modelling languages in the context of language use, and particularly speech act theory. These concepts are then applied to the problems introduced by the "Orthogonal Classification Architecture" that is often called the ontological/ linguistic paradox. The aim of the paper is to show how it is possible to overcome these problems. Method: The paper adopts a conceptual-analytical approach by revisiting the published arguments and developing an alternative metamodelling architecture based on language use. Results: The analysis shows that when we apply a language use perspective of meaning to traditional modelling concepts, a number of incongruities and misconceptions in the traditional approaches are revealed - issues that are not evident in previous work based primarily on set theory. Clearly differentiating between the extensional and intensional aspects of class concepts (as sets) and also between objects (in the social world) and things (in the physical world) allows for a deeper understanding to be gained of the relationship between the ontological and linguistic views promulgated in the modelling world. Conclusions: We propose that a viewpoint that integrates language use ideas into traditional modelling (and metamodelling) is vital, and stress that meaning is not inherent in the physical world; meaning, and thus socially valid objects, are constructed by use of language, which may or may not establish a one-to-one correspondence relationship between objects and physical things.
机译：尽管普遍认为元模型化对于我们对软件和系统开发的理解很重要，但是关于本体元模型与语言元模型化的有效性和实用性的争论仍在继续。目的：本文在语言使用，尤其是言语行为理论的背景下，考察了以元模型为中心的传统建模语言构造。然后将这些概念应用于“正交分类体系结构”引入的问题，该体系通常称为本体论/语言悖论。本文的目的是展示如何克服这些问题。方法：通过重新审视已发表的论点并开发基于语言使用的替代元建模体系结构，本文采用了概念分析的方法。结果：分析表明，当我们将语言使用意义的观点应用到传统建模概念时，传统方法中会出现许多不一致和误解的问题-在先前基于集合论的工作中，这些问题并不明显。班级概念（作为集合）的可扩展性和内涵性方面之间的明显区分，以及（在社会世界中的）对象与事物（在物理世界中）之间的显着区别，可以使人们对本体论和语言学观点之间的关系有更深入的了解。在建模世界中颁布。结论：我们认为将语言使用思想整合到传统建模（和元建模）中的观点至关重要，并强调意义不是物理世界固有的；意义是通过使用语言来构造的，从而具有社会上的合法对象，而语言可能会或可能不会在对象与物理事物之间建立一一对应的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号