...
首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >In defence of modal essentialism
【24h】

In defence of modal essentialism

机译:捍卫情态本质主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Kit Fine's arguments in Essence and Modality are widely accepted as being a decisive blow against modal essentialism. A selection of replies exist that have done little to counter the general view that modally construed essence is out of touch with what we really mean when we make essentialist claims. I argue that Fine's arguments fail to strike a decisive blow, and I suggest a new interpretation of the debate that shows why Fine's arguments fall short of achieving their goal.
机译:Kit Fine在“本质与模态”中的论点被广泛接受,是对模态本质主义的决定性打击。存在一些答复,这些答复并没有起到什么作用,无法反驳普遍的观点,即模态解释的本质与我们提出本质主义主张时的真实含义是脱节的。我认为,菲恩的论点没有受到决定性的打击,并且我建议对辩论进行新的解释,以显示为什么菲恩的论点未能实现其目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号