...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >The Role of Intuitions in the Philosophy of Art
【24h】

The Role of Intuitions in the Philosophy of Art

机译：直觉在艺术哲学中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

According to Herman Cappelen and Bernard Molyneux, it is widely assumed that intuitions are used as evidence for philosophical theories in all areas of philosophy. Philosophers' self-image, however, is wrong. This wrong self-image, so they argue, has merely misled metaphilosophers, but has had no substantial implications for philosophical practices. This article examines the role of intuitions in the project of defining art. In accordance with Cappelen and Molyneux, I demonstrate that philosophers of art believe intuitions are used as evidence for their definitions of art and that this belief is false. In contrast with Cappelen and Molyneux, I maintain that philosophers of art's false self-image causes substantial damage to their philosophical practice. Firstly, intuitions often are used as persuaders, while, in fact, they do not add philosophical force to the defended position. Secondly, and more importantly, intuition-talk and philosophers' wrong self-image are partly responsible for the confusion surrounding the kind of analysis a definition of art offers. Using intuitions as evidence presupposes a descriptive approach to the definition of art. However, since intuitions are not used as evidence, it is unclear whether a definition offers a descriptive, normative or metaphysical analysis of art.
机译：根据赫尔曼·卡佩伦（Herman Cappelen）和伯纳德·莫利纽克斯（Bernard Molyneux）的观点，人们普遍认为直觉被用作哲学所有领域中哲学理论的证据。但是，哲学家的自我形象是错误的。他们认为，这种错误的自我形象只是误导了元哲学家，而对哲学实践没有实质性影响。本文探讨了直觉在定义艺术项目中的作用。根据Cappelen和Molyneux，我证明艺术哲学家认为直觉被用作其艺术定义的证据，并且这种信念是错误的。与Cappelen和Molyneux相反，我坚持认为艺术哲学家的虚假自我形象会对他们的哲学实践造成重大损害。首先，直觉经常被用作说服力，而事实上，它们并没有为被捍卫地位增加哲学力量。其次，更重要的是，直觉谈话和哲学家的错误自我形象是造成艺术品定义分析类型混乱的部分原因。使用直觉作为证据，前提是对艺术定义采用描述性方法。但是，由于没有将直觉用作证据，因此尚不清楚定义是否提供对艺术的描述性，规范性或形而上学分析。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inquiry》 |2015年第8期|806-827|共22页
  • 作者

    Monsere Annelies;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Ghent, Fac Arts & Philosophy, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号