...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >Must the Sacred be Transcendent?;
【24h】

Must the Sacred be Transcendent?;

机译：神圣必须超越吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In his book A Secular Age, Charles Taylor appeals to the metaphysical-normative distinction between "immanence" and "transcendence" as definitive for post-Axial religion. On Taylor's view, therefore, those of us who embrace a fully secular modernity can be described as having abandoned "transcendence" to take up our lives wholly within the confines of the immanent frame, though he grants we may seek alternative satisfactions or "substitutes" for eternity. But the notion that any metaphysical-normative model of sacred experience can serve as an irresistible foundation is open to doubt if one recalls the Heideggerian insight that any metaphysical picture both reveals and conceals aspects of our experience. Taylor's own description of sacred and non-sacred experience within the immanent frame seems to rely upon this founda-tional distinction, without entertaining the possibility that the language itself may very well actually distort what our experience is like. This paper pursues the above objections to Taylor's argument, focusing special attention on the assumption that one can judge aesthetic experience (such as listening to a Beethoven string quartet) with the criteria we have inherited from post-Axial religion. The overwhelming authority of the Axial tradition might seem to validate questions such as, "Is there an object?" or "Is the experience purely immanent?" But to such questions we might respond that such language simply has no grip on the phenomena. Any such talk of "substitution" might therefore be understood as an historical remnant in Taylor's book of the traditional monotheist's critique of idolatry.
机译：查尔斯·泰勒（Charles Taylor）在他的《世俗时代》一书中呼吁“内在性”和“超越性”之间的形而上学规范的区别是后轴宗教的权威。因此，从泰勒的观点来看，我们当中那些完全具有世俗现代性的人可以被描述为放弃“超越”而完全在固有框架的范围内占据了我们的生活，尽管他承认我们可能寻求替代性的满足或“替代”。永恒。但是，任何关于神圣经验的形而上学规范的模型都可以作为不可抗拒的基础的观念，人们是否会回想起海德格尔的见解，即任何形而上学的画面都可以揭示和掩盖我们经验的观点，这值得怀疑。泰勒自己对内在框架中的神圣和非神圣经验的描述似乎依赖于这种基础性的区别，而没有考虑语言本身很可能实际上扭曲我们的经验的可能性。本文针对泰勒的论点提出了上述异议，特别关注一种假设，即可以根据我们从后轴宗教继承的标准来判断审美经验（例如听贝多芬弦乐四重奏）。轴向传统的压倒性权威似乎可以验证诸如“是否有物体？”之类的问题。或“体验纯粹是内在的？”但是对于这些问题，我们可能会回答说，这种语言根本无法控制这种现象。因此，在泰勒的传统一神论者对偶像崇拜的批判中，任何有关“替代”的说法都可以理解为历史遗留物。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inquiry》 |2011年第2期|p.126-139|共14页
  • 作者

    PETER E. GORDON;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University, Center for European Studies,Room 305, 27 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号