• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >The Phenomenological Failure of Groundwork III
【24h】

The Phenomenological Failure of Groundwork III

机译：基础工程的现象学失败III

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Henry Allison and Paul Guyer have recently offered interpretations of Kant's argument in Groundwork III. These interpretations share this premise: the argument moves from a non-moral, theoretical premise to a moral conclusion, and the failure of the argument is a failure to make this jump from the non-moral to the moral. This characterization both of the nature of the argument and its failure is flawed. Consider instead the possibility that in Groundwork III, Kant is struggling toward something rather different from this, not trying to pull the moral rabbit out of the theoretical hat, but instead seeking a proto-phenomenological grounding of morality: a grounding that begins from first personal felt experiences that already possess moral content, and proceeds to its further practical claims via attentive reflection on these felt experiences. This paper brings this assumption to our reading of Groundwork III, showing that in doing so we acquire a deeper appreciation both of the argument, and the reasons it fails. Kant's argument is practical throughout. And the failure of the argument is the failure of Kant's nascent efforts to provide a new, phenomenological method for the grounding of practical philosophy.
机译：亨利·艾莉森（Henry Allison）和保罗·盖尔（Paul Guyer）最近在《基础三》中对康德的论点进行了解释。这些解释具有这样的前提：论证从非道德的理论前提转变为道德的结论，而论证的失败则是无法使之从非道德的观点转向道德的观点的失败。这种论点性质及其失败的描述都是有缺陷的。相反，请考虑康德在《地基三世》中正在朝着与此截然不同的方向奋斗的可能性，不是试图将道德兔子从理论帽子中拉出来，而是寻求一种道德的现象学基础：从第一个人开始的基础。感觉体验已经具有道德内涵，并通过对这些感觉体验的专心思考而进行进一步的实践主张。本文将这一假设带入了我们对《基础工作III》的阅读，表明这样做可以使我们对这一论点及其失败的原因有更深刻的理解。康德的论点贯穿始终。论据的失败是康德在为实践哲学的基础提供新的现象学方法的努力中的失败。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inquiry》 |2009年第4期|335-356|共22页
  • 作者

    JEANINE M. GRENBERG;

  • 作者单位

    St. Olaf College, Department of Philosophy, 1520 St. Olaf Avenue, Northfield, MN 55057, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号