• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >The Myth of the Metaphysical Circle: An Analysis of the Contemporary Crisis of the Critique of Metaphysics
【24h】

The Myth of the Metaphysical Circle: An Analysis of the Contemporary Crisis of the Critique of Metaphysics

机译：形而上学界的神话：对形而上学批判的当代危机的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Examination of contemporary debates on metaphysics and its critique yields the conclusion that there is an overall tendency to defend an inextricable bond between them. According to the vast majority of participants in these debates, any reaction against metaphysics, however powerful or radical, is bound to remain trapped in the metaphysical tradition. The dominant view is that criticism either remains tied to or eventually returns to forms of metaphysics, if it does not in fact remain metaphysical in itself. This view confirms the persistence of a typical pattern, namely, that of a circular relationship between metaphysics and its critique. Conspicuous by its absence is the idea of a critique of metaphysics that is not caught up in this vicious metaphysical circle. Moreover, the alleged self-defeating and counterproductive character of critique has become so widely and uncritically accepted-even among opponents of metaphysics-that strong and well-founded objections to metaphysics have largely disappeared from philosophical discourse. Contrary to the conventional idea of a crisis of metaphysics, there appears to be a crisis of the critique of metaphysics. This paper attempts to turn the tide of this crisis. It demonstrates that the categorical assertion of a circular relationship between metaphysics and its critique cannot be logically justified. Furthermore, it presents three different forms of criticism that cannot be metaphysically recuperated. It therefore concludes that the wide acceptance of the idea of an inescapable metaphysical circle, instead of being inspired by sound and irrefutable arguments, is essentially based on a myth.
机译：对当代有关形而上学及其批判的辩论的研究得出的结论是，存在着捍卫它们之间不可分割的联系的总体趋势。这些辩论的绝大多数参与者认为，对形而上学的任何反应，无论多么强大或激进，都必定会陷于形而上学的传统之中。占主导地位的观点是，批评实际上仍然与形而上学联系在一起，或者甚至最终会返回到形而上学的形式上。这种观点证实了一种典型模式的持久性，即形而上学与其批评之间的循环关系。缺乏形而上学的引人注目的是对形而上学的批判并没有陷入这个恶性形而上学的圈子。此外，所谓的批评的自我毁灭和适得其反的性质已经变得如此广泛和不加批判地接受，甚至在形而上学的反对者中也是如此，以至于对形而上学的强烈和有充分根据的异议在哲学论述中已基本消失。与形而上学危机的传统观念相反，似乎存在着形而上学批判的危机。本文试图扭转这场危机的潮流。它表明，在形而上学和它的批评之间的循环关系的断言不能在逻辑上被证明是正确的。此外，它提出了三种不同形式的批评，这些批评不能从形而上调和。因此，得出的结论是，不可避免的形而上学界这一观念的广泛接受，本质上是基于一个神话，而不是受到声音和无可辩驳的争论的启发。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inquiry》 |2008年第3期|p.312-341|共30页
  • 作者

    HERBERT DE VRIESE;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy, University of Antwerp, Stadscampus, S.D. 409, Grote Kauwenberg 18, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学、宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号