On Studying the Past Scientifically

THEODORE SCHATZKI

首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >On Studying the Past Scientifically

【24h】

On Studying the Past Scientifically

机译：科学地研究过去

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This critical review of Aviezer Tucker's Our Knowledge of the Past: A Philosophy of Historiography examines the character, scope, and limits of scientific-historiography, the overall topic of Tucker's book. The review begins by arguing that the book both unwittingly juggles two critefia for scientific, as opposed to nonscientific, historiography - the production of knowledge and Kuhnian disciplinary matrices - and wrongly construes the subject matter of such historiography to be present evidence for the past as opposed to this evidence in addition to the past itself. There ensues a lengthy discussion of the role of theories in scientific historiography that (1) contests Tucker's thesis that theories of information transmission and grand social theories are central to the enterprise, (2) criticizes his failure to distinguish technical from theoretical terms, and (3) claims that scholarly historiography is more of an art than a science. The review concludes by arguing that scientific historiography as Tucker conceives of it cannot meet the many needs society has vis-a-vis the past.

机译：对阿维泽·塔克（Aviezer Tucker）的《我们过去的知识：历史学的哲学》进行的批判性审查，考察了科学史学的性质，范围和局限性，而科学史学是塔克著作的整体主题。回顾从争论开始，认为这本书既不知不觉地将两个对科学的批评，而不是对非历史的史学进行了变通-知识的产生和库恩主义的学科矩阵-并错误地将这种史学的主题解释为过去的现实证据，而不是相反除了过去本身之外，还有这些证据。随后对理论在科学史学中的作用进行了长时间的讨论：（1）反对塔克（Tucker）的论点，即信息传播理论和盛大的社会理论是企业的核心;（2）批评他未能区分技术和理论术语。（ 3）声称学术史学是一门艺术，而不是一门科学。该评论的结论是，塔克（Tucker）认为科学史学无法满足社会相对于过去的许多需求。

著录项

来源
《Inquiry》 |2006年第4期|p.380-399|共20页
作者
THEODORE SCHATZKI;
展开▼
作者单位

University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA;

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类哲学、宗教;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Studies in the theory of scientific research. Part 1. Theory of information transfer by scientific publications: Basic rules to optimise the effect of scientific communication [J] . Kao Lin, Shiu Sisako, Josef Horak Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly . 2010,第1期

机译：科学研究理论研究。第1部分。科学出版物的信息传递理论：优化科学传播效果的基本规则
2. Frequency distribution of journalistic attention for scientific studies and scientific sources: An input–output analysis [J] . Markus Lehmkuhl, Nikolai Promies PLoS One . 2020,第11期

机译：科学研究和科学来源新闻关注的频率分布：输入输出分析
3. Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider*: Review of Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Review of Current Practices for Ultrastructural Pathology Evaluations in Support of Nonclinical Toxicology Studies [J] . Keirstead Natalie D., Janovitz Evan B., Meehan James T., Toxicologic pathology . 2019,第4期

机译：科学和监管政策委员会要考虑*：科学和监管政策委员会的审查要点：对支持非临床毒理学研究的超微结构病理评估目前的实践审查
4. Science and Scientific Literacy vs Science and Scientific Awareness through Basic Physics Lectures: A Study of Wish and Reality [C] . Aloysius Rusli International Conference on Physics and its Applications . 2012

机译：科学与科学素养与基础物理讲座的科学和科学意识：愿望与现实研究
5. Scientific outreach: Linking environmental science education in high schools with scientific research a case study of the Schools on Board program. [D] . Barber, Lucette M. J. 2009

机译：科学宣传：将高中的环境科学教育与科学研究联系在一起，以“学校在校”计划为例。
6. Draft for internal testing Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSAs scientific assessments [O] . EFSA Scientific Committee, Simon More, Vasileos Bambidis, 2020

机译：内部测试科学委员会关于评估和整合来自流行病学研究中的证据的指导以EFSA科学评估的评估和整合证据
7. We develop a model of scientific creativity and test it in the field of rare diseases. Our model is based on the results of an in-depth case study of the Rett syndrome. Archival analysis, bibliometric techniques and expert surveys are combined with network analysis to identify the most creative scientists. First, alternative measures of generative and combinatorial creativity are compared. Then, we generalize our results and present a stochastic model of socio-semantic network evolution. The model predictions are tested with multiple networks of rare disease specialties. We find that new scientific collaborations among experts in a field enhance combinatorial creativity. Instead, high entry rates of novices are negatively related to generative creativity. By extending the set of useful concepts, creative scientists gain in centrality. At the same time, by increasing their centrality in the scientific community, scientists can replicate and generalize their results, thus contributing to a scientific paradigm. [O] . Massimo Riccaboni, Maria Laura Frigotto 100

机译：我们开发了一种科学创造力模型，并在稀有疾病领域进行测试。我们的模型基于对Rett综合征的深入案例研究的结果。档案分析，文献计量技术和专家调查与网络分析相结合，以确定最具创造力的科学家。首先，比较生成和组合创造力的替代措施。然后，我们推广了我们的结果，并提出了社会语义网络演化的随机模型。模型预测用多个罕见疾病专业网络进行测试。我们发现，一个领域的专家之间的新的科学合作增强了组合创造力。相反，新手的高入门率与生成创造力负相关。通过扩展这组有用的概念，创造性的科学家获得了中心地位。同时，通过增加科学界的中心地位，科学家们可以复制和推广他们的结果，从而促进科学范式的发展。
8. Long Term Scientific Study/44 (LTSS/44): Environmental Technologies forApplication to NATO Military Assets and Bases. Volume 1: Main Report. Panel 1 on Long-Term Scientific Studies [R] . Tumarkin, J. E., Clark, S. L., Coppet, L., 1996

机译：长期科学研究/ 44（LTss / 44）：适用于北约军事资产和基地的环境技术。第1卷：主要报告。关于长期科学研究的第1小组

On Studying the Past Scientifically

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅