• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >Indicatives at stake
【24h】

Indicatives at stake

机译：关键指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Several authors have claimed that indicative conditionals are sensitive to the epistemic perspective of agents. According to this sort of view, the truth of an indicative conditional depends on the background evidence of some relevant agent or group of agents. In this paper, I argue that the context-dependence of indicative conditionals goes beyond this. Indicative conditionals are not only sensitive to the evidence of agents, but also to contextual factors that determine what is inferable from such background evidence (plus the antecedent of the conditional). More specifically, my proposal is that when the inference associated with a conditional is defeasible, the truth of that conditional is sensitive to practical stakes (in a similar way that knowledge claims are sensitive to practical stakes).
机译：几位作者声称指示性条件对代理的认知观点敏感。根据这种观点，指示性条件的真实性取决于某些相关代理或代理组的背景证据。在本文中，我认为指示性条件的上下文相关性超出了此范围。指示性条件句不仅对主体的证据敏感，而且对确定可从此类背景证据（加上条件的先决条件）推断出什么的上下文因素敏感。更具体地说，我的建议是，当与条件相关的推论是不可行的时，该条件的真相就对实际利益敏感（以类似于知识主张对实际利益敏感的方式）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号