...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >Federal Circuit Confirms Strength of U.S. Patent Rights by Reaffirming Its Prior Rulings against Foreign Patent Exhaustion and in Favor of Post-Sale Restrictions
【24h】

Federal Circuit Confirms Strength of U.S. Patent Rights by Reaffirming Its Prior Rulings against Foreign Patent Exhaustion and in Favor of Post-Sale Restrictions

机译：联邦巡回法院通过重申其先前针对外国专利穷竭和有利于售后限制的裁决，确认了美国专利权的实力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In its much anticipated en banc decision in Lexmark International v. Impression Products, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reaffirmed its prior rulings that (1) overseas sales of a product do not exhaust a patent owner's patent rights within the United States, and (2) the sale of a patented article, when made under a restriction that is otherwise lawful and within the scope of the patent grant, does not give rise to patent exhaustion.1 On the first issue, the Federal Circuit rejected arguments that, based on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision concerning exhaustion in the copyright context in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley, it should overrule its earlier decision in Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Commission, which held that the sale of a patented item outside the United States never gives rise to patent exhaustion under U.S. law. Similarly, on the second issue, the Federal Circuit rejected arguments that the Supreme Court's decision in Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics should lead it to overrule its prior decision in Mallinckrodt v. Medipart to uphold post-sale restrictions on patented products.
机译：美国联邦巡回上诉法院在Lexmark International诉Impression Products案中备受期待的全盘判决中，重申了其先前的裁定：（1）产品的海外销售并未在美国范围内耗尽专利所有人的专利权， （2）专利产品的销售在合法的限制内并在专利授予的范围内进行时，不会导致专利用尽。1在第一个问题上，联邦巡回法院驳回了以下论点：根据美国最高法院关于Kirtsaeng诉John Wiley案中版权用尽的裁决，应推翻其先前在Jazz Photo Corp.诉国际贸易委员会案中的裁决，该裁决裁定在美国境外出售专利产品绝不会根据美国法律引起专利枯竭。同样，在第二个问题上，联邦巡回法院驳回了最高法院在Quanta Computer诉LG Electronics案中的裁决应导致其推翻先前在Mallinckrodt诉Medipart案中的裁决以维持专利产品售后限制的论点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号