The Patent Trial and Appeal Board Second Anniversary: Reflections and Strategies for the Years Ahead

Eleanor M.Yost; April Weisbruch; Natasha Daughtrey; Sumedha Ahuja; Darjush Boushehri

首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >The Patent Trial and Appeal Board Second Anniversary: Reflections and Strategies for the Years Ahead

【24h】

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board Second Anniversary: Reflections and Strategies for the Years Ahead

机译：专利审判和上诉委员会成立二周年：未来几年的思考和对策

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

What a difference two years can make. In 2012, the America Invents Act (the ALA) created new proceedings to challenge the validity of claims in issued patents. These proceedings are administered by the US Patent & Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the PTAB or the Board) and are heard by a panel of administrative patent judges who make rulings regarding institution of trials, discovery matters and, ultimately, the patentability of the claims. At the outset, Congress provided that the PTAB may limit the number of petitions to 281 per year. But now, two years after the proceedings began, nearly 2,000 petitions have been filed-about 200 petitions per month, as of late-and there are no signs of things slowing down. This article reflects on the last two years at the PTAB, including how district courts are treating the proceedings, how to win at PTAB motion practice, and what to expect in the year ahead.

机译：两年可以带来什么变化。 2012年，《美国发明法》（ALA）提出了新的程序，以质疑已发布专利中权利要求的有效性。这些程序由美国专利商标局的专利审判和上诉委员会（PTAB或委员会）进行管理，并由行政专利法官小组进行听证，他们对审判的机构，发现事项以及最终的专利权做出裁决。索赔。首先，国会规定PTAB可以将每年的请愿数量限制为281个。但是现在，在诉讼开始两年之后，近来已经提交了2000份请愿书-每月近200份请愿书-而且没有迹象表明事情会放缓。本文回顾了PTAB的最近两年，包括地区法院如何处理诉讼程序，如何在PTAB的动议中胜诉以及对未来一年的期望。

著录项

来源
《Intellectual property & technology law journal》 |2014年第12期|3-13|共11页
作者
Eleanor M.Yost; April Weisbruch; Natasha Daughtrey; Sumedha Ahuja; Darjush Boushehri;
展开▼
作者单位

Intellectual Property Litigation Group;

Litigation Department and Intellectual Property Group;

Litigation Department and Intellectual Property Group;

Litigation Department and Intellectual Property Group;

Litigation Department and Intellectual Property Group;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board after two years: future challenges [J] . Wayne O Stacy, Adam M Pivovar Intellectual Property Decisions . 2014,第nova期

机译：两年后专利审判和上诉委员会：未来的挑战
2. Winning It on Appeal: How to Avoid Remand and Reverse the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's Validity Determination at the Federal Circuit [J] . James S. Blank, David Soofian Intellectual property & technology law journal . 2016,第9期

机译：在上诉中胜诉：如何避免在联邦巡回法院避免还审和驳回专利审判和上诉委员会的有效性
3. KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM 'THE INTERSECTION OF UNIVERSITY INVENTIONS AND RECENT CASES AT THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD (PTAB)' [J] . Andrew Maas, Kaylan Deshpande, Kyle E. Friesen, Technology and innovation . 2020,第2期

机译：来自“专利审判和上诉委员会（PTAB）”的大学发明交叉案件的关键外卖
4. How long should a fen grassland field trial last ? Reflections on the dry matter yield of a nitrogen fertilisation field trial on northeast German fen grassland over 55 years [C] . General Meeting of The European Grassland Federation . 2018

机译：Fen Grassland Field审判最后应该多久？ 55年多年来德国汾草原对氮肥田试验干物质产量的思考
5. Constructing a Legacy: The Role of Anniversary Commemorations in Remembering Brown v. Board of Education [D] . Bruner, Jaclyn Leigh. 2019

机译：构建遗产：在记住棕色v中的周年纪念纪念的作用。教育委员会
6. Reflections on 200 years of Nitrogen 20 years later: This article belongs to Ambio’s 50th Anniversary Collection. Theme: Eutrophication [O] . James N. Galloway, Ellis B. Cowling 2021

机译：20年后200年氮的思考：本文属于Ambio的50周年收藏品。主题：富营养化
7. The Framingham Offspring Study: a commentary1150th AnniversaryHistorical ArticleINTRODUCTIONIn this edition of the Journal, we release the fifth in a series of reviews of influential articles that have been previously published in ACC journals, including the American Journal of Cardiology(from 1958 to 1982) and JACC(from 1983 to the present). The publication of these articles is only one aspect of the ACC’s 50th anniversary commemoration, which highlights 50 years of leadership in cardiovascular care and education. The articles are intended to encourage reflection on the remarkable progress made in cardiovascular medicine over time, as well as to acknowledge the amazing prescience of some early investigators in anticipating and, in many cases, later guiding developments in their field.The working group responsible for selecting these articles and asking reviewers to write editorials solicited suggestions from the ACC’s clinical committees and individual members.The group achieved consensus fairly easily, including whom the group should ask to prepare the accompanying editorials. We initially drew up a list of 14 general areas to cover in this series, but later found that there are several major areas of modern cardiology, prominently molecular cardiology, in which the truly landmark articles have, alas, not yet been published in JACC. Therefore, the working group decided not to categorize by subject, but instead, to concentrate on the most important articles.The working group, a task force of the Subcommittee for the Commemoration of the ACC 50th Anniversary, owes a great deal to Ms. May A. Roustom and the efficient and tireless staff at Heart House for facilitating this project. We also wish to thank all who suggested articles and, most important, the authors who prepared reviews for their willingness to contribute their time and wisdom.Influential Articles in JACC Working GroupSharon A. Hunt, M.D., F.A.C.C.Rick A. Nishimura, M.D., F.A.C.C.H.J.C. Swan, M.D., Ph.D., M.A.C.C.Michael J. Wolk, M.D., F.A.C.C. [O] . Swan H.J.C 1999

机译：弗雷明汉后代研究：1150周年历史文章引言在本期杂志中，我们发布了一系列有影响力的文章的第五篇评论，这些评论先前已在ACC期刊上发表，包括《美国心脏病学杂志》（1958年至1982年）和《美国心脏病学会杂志》（从1983年至今）。这些文章的发表只是ACC成立50周年纪念的一个方面，该纪念日着重介绍了心血管护理和教育领域50年的领导地位。这些文章旨在鼓励人们对心血管医学随着时间的推移所取得的显着进展进行反思，并承认一些早期研究人员在预见并在许多情况下为他们领域的发展提供指导的惊人先见之明。选择这些文章并要求审稿人撰写社论，征求ACC临床委员会和个人成员的建议。该小组相当容易达成共识，包括该小组应要求谁准备随附的社论。我们最初拟出了本系列文章涵盖的14个常规领域的清单，但后来发现现代心脏病学有几个主要领域，主要是分子心脏病学，可惜的是，真正的具有里程碑意义的文章尚未在JACC上发表。因此，工作组决定不按主题进行分类，而是专注于最重要的文章。工作组是ACC成立50周年纪念小组委员会的一个工作组，在很大程度上要归功于梅女士。 A. Roustom和Heart House高效而孜孜不倦的员工为该项目提供了便利。我们还要感谢所有提出建议的文章，最重要的是感谢准备撰写评论以贡献自己的时间和智慧的作者.JACC工作组的有影响力的文章Sharon A. Swan，M.D.，Ph.D.，M.A.C.C. Michael J.Wolk，M.D.，F.A.C.C.
8. Board of Veterans Appeals 50th Anniversary, 1933-1983 [R] . 1983

机译：退伍军人委员会上诉50周年，1933-1983

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board Second Anniversary: Reflections and Strategies for the Years Ahead

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅