COMBINATION OF TWO EARLIER PATENTS RENDERED PATENT DIRECTED TO HIGH PERFORMANCE DATA CABLES INVALID FOR OBVIOUSNESS

首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual Property Counselor >COMBINATION OF TWO EARLIER PATENTS RENDERED PATENT DIRECTED TO HIGH PERFORMANCE DATA CABLES INVALID FOR OBVIOUSNESS

【24h】

COMBINATION OF TWO EARLIER PATENTS RENDERED PATENT DIRECTED TO HIGH PERFORMANCE DATA CABLES INVALID FOR OBVIOUSNESS

机译：定向于高性能的数据电缆的两种较早的专利（针对显而易见的性能而被授予专利）

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

A combination of two earlier patents rendered a patent directed to high performance data cables and methods of making such cables invalid for obviousness, in relation to a limitation for the "plurality of protrusions". The earlier patents disclosed all limitations in the subject patent. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine said patents regardless of whether they addressed the same type of crosstalk. Further, the patent holders were unable to show that secondary indicia of non-obviousness overcame the competitors' showing of invalidity because the patent holders were unable to establish any nexus between sales and the patented invention or that $3 million in sales constituted a commercial success.

机译：相对于对“多个突起”的限制，两项先前的专利的组合使专利针对高性能数据电缆以及使这种电缆变得明显而无效的方法。先前的专利公开了本主题专利中的所有限制。本领域普通技术人员将被激励去组合所述专利，而不管它们是否解决了相同类型的串扰。此外，专利持有人无法证明非显而易见性的次级标记克服了竞争对手的无效性，因为专利持有人无法在销售与专利发明之间建立任何联系，或者300万美元的销售构成了商业上的成功。

著录项

来源
《Intellectual Property Counselor》 |2011年第179期|p.23|共1页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. In re Metoprolol Succinate Patent Litigation: Composition claims render later product claims invalid for obviousness-type double patenting [J] . Frederick H Rein, Joseph B Crystal Journal of generic medicines . 2008,第2期

机译：关于美托洛尔琥珀酸酯的专利诉讼：组合物索赔使后来的产品索赔对显而易见性重复专利无效
2. House of Lords provides guidance on the law of obviousness in patent actions; increased opportunities to obtain supplementary protection certificates for combinations of active ingredients; patent for DNA and protein sequence invalid due to lack of industrial application [J] . Michael Burdon, James Armstrong, Catherine Katzka, Journal of generic medicines . 2008,第1期

机译：上议院就专利诉讼中的明显性法律提供指导;增加了获得有效成分组合的补充保护证书的机会;由于缺乏工业应用，DNA和蛋白质序列专利无效
3. PATENT ON CRESTOR WAS NOT INVALID ON GROUND OF OBVIOUSNESS [J] . Intellectual property counselor . 2013,第194期

机译：显而易见，对Crestor的专利无效
4. WHAT EVERY PLASTICS PROFESSIONAL SHOULD KNOW ABOUT PATENTS AND PATENTING - PART 4: THE NON-OBVIOUSNESS REQUIREMENT FOR PATENTABILITY IN LIGHT OF KSR v. TELEFLEX [C] . Amad Tayebi Annual technical conference of the Society of Plastics Engineers;ANTEC 2011 . 2011

机译：每个塑料专业人士都应该了解专利和专利的知识-第4部分：根据KSR诉TELEFLEX，对专利的非显而易见性要求
5. Is it Obvious? A Review and Critique of the Non-Obviousness Patent Requirement. [D] . Hashim, Mohamed R. 2012

机译：很明显吗？对非显而易见性专利要求的审查和批判。
6. Functional performance improvement data and patent sets for 30 technology domains with measurements of patent centrality and estimations of the improvement rate [O] . Giorgio Triulzi, Christopher L. Magee 2020

机译：具有30个技术领域的功能性能改进数据和专利集具有专利中心的测量和提高率的估计
7. Is the Time Allocated to Review Patent Applications Inducing Examiners to Grant Invalid Patents?: Evidence from Micro-Level Application Data [O] . Frakes, Michael D., Wasserman, Melissa F. 2016

机译：是否分配了审查专利申请的时间，以诱导审查员授予无效的专利？：来自微观申请数据的证据

COMBINATION OF TWO EARLIER PATENTS RENDERED PATENT DIRECTED TO HIGH PERFORMANCE DATA CABLES INVALID FOR OBVIOUSNESS

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅