• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics and Business Law >Reaffirming the Role of the Directorate of Market Abuse and the Meaning of 'Inside Information' in the Adjudication of Insider Trading Cases: Zietsman and Another v Directorate of Market Abuse and Another 2016 1 SA 218 (GP)
【24h】

Reaffirming the Role of the Directorate of Market Abuse and the Meaning of 'Inside Information' in the Adjudication of Insider Trading Cases: Zietsman and Another v Directorate of Market Abuse and Another 2016 1 SA 218 (GP)

机译：重申市场滥用总局的作用和内幕信息在裁定内幕交易案中的含义：Zietsman和另一人诉市场滥用总局及另一人2016 1 SA 218（GP）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Insider trading activities are outlawed in many countries, including South Africa. Such activities have interfered with the smooth operations of various financial markets in both developed and developing countries to date. Anti-insider trading regulatory authorities have grappled to combat the occurrence and negative effects of insider trading in the South African financial markets since the early 1970s. This has been exacerbated in part, by the complexities involving the meaning and interpretation of inside information in relation to insider trading offences by the courts, the Directorate of Market Abuse and the Enforcement Committee. Moreover, the adoption of few anti-insider trading enforcement approaches has contributed to the inconsistent enforcement of the insider trading prohibition in South Africa. These flaws have been recently exposed by the EC determination and the subsequent High Court judgment in Zietsman and Anotherv Directorate of Market Abuse and Another 2016 1 SA 218 (GP). To this end, the article provides an overview analysis of this landmark case which has brought some legal certainty regarding the court's application and interpretation of the meaning of 'inside information' in relation to the adjudication of insider trading cases in South Africa.
机译：内幕交易活动在包括南非在内的许多国家都被禁止。迄今为止，这种活动已经干扰了发达国家和发展中国家各个金融市场的平稳运行。自1970年代初以来，反内幕交易监管机构努力应对南非金融市场内幕交易的发生和负面影响。法院，市场滥用局和执法委员会对涉及内幕交易犯罪的内幕信息的含义和解释的复杂性在一定程度上加剧了这一情况。此外，采用很少的反内幕交易执行方法导致南非内幕交易禁令执行不一致。这些缺陷最近在EC裁定中以及随后在Zietsman和Anotherv市场滥用局以及Another 2016 1 SA 218（GP）中被高等法院判决揭露。为此，本文对这一具有里程碑意义的案件进行了概述性分析，为法院在南非对内幕交易案件的裁定中对“内幕信息”的适用和解释提供了法律上的确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号