• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Intereconomics >Modernisation of EC competition law, economy and horizontal cooperation between undertakings
【24h】

Modernisation of EC competition law, economy and horizontal cooperation between undertakings

机译：欧共体竞争法，经济和企业间横向合作的现代化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

From both the Commission's explanatory comments to the proposal for the new “Regulation 17” and the new approach towards horizontal co-operation agreements as witnessed in the Guidelines and the two group exemption regulations, it seems abundantly clear that the Commission holds the view that the time is not yet ripe for an overall safe harbour approach for horizontal co-operation agreements. That being the case, there would have been no objection—if only for an intermediate step and until the moment that the horizontal market would be ripe for an overall safe harbour approach—to the introduction of a notification system for such horizontal agreements similar to the one applicable for vertical restraints by virtue of Regulation 1216/1999.47 This would have considerably alleviated the Commission's workload as far as reducing the number of and dealing with notifications is concerned. If this system had been combined with the sharing of the exemption powers by the Commission with the NCAs—which would have been a truly appropriate and proportional signal regarding the application of the principle of subsidiarity—this would have left the complicated economic assessment under article 81(3) where it belongs, i.e. with the administrative authorities that would be best placed (and trained) to perform this task. The national courts could then continue to concentrate on their tasks as defined by the ECJ in Delimitis, with the result that these institutions would also be doing exactly that for which they are best placed and trained, i.e. the application of the legal norms provided for in article 81(1) and (2) and article 82. The proposals of the Commission are deemed to be premature—at least in the view of this author—in the light of the forthcoming enlargement of the EU, the enforcement puzzles as described above, the monitoring of the cohesion of Community competition law and all the problems of training that come with it. The Commission's workload is likely to increase as a result of all this, and not just for an intermediate period of time but expectedly forever.
机译：从委员会的解释性评论到对新的“条例17”的提议以及在准则和两项集体豁免条例中所见证的对横向合作协议的新方法，委员会似乎很清楚地认为，对于横向合作协议的整体安全港方法的时机尚未成熟。在这种情况下，如果只是采取一个中间步骤，直到横向市场对整体安全港方法成熟时，就不会反对为此类横向协议引入通知制度。根据条例1216 / 1999.47 适用于纵向限制的措施。就减少通知的数量和处理通知而言，这将大大减轻委员会的工作量。如果将此制度与委员会与国家协调委员会共享豁免权结合在一起，这将是关于应用辅助性原则的真正适当和成比例的信号，那么这将使根据第81条进行复杂的经济评估（3）它所属的地方，即与最有能力（和受过训练）执行此任务的行政机关一起。然后，国家法院可以继续专注于欧洲法院在Delimitis所定义的任务，结果这些机构也将完全按照自己的最佳条件和培训去做，即应用法律中规定的法律规范。第81条第（1）款和第（2）款以及第82条。鉴于欧盟即将扩大，上述的执行难题使委员会的建议被认为为时过早（至少从作者看来）。 ，监控社区竞争法的凝聚力以及随之而来的所有培训问题。由于这一切，委员会的工作量可能会增加，不仅是在中间时期，而且预计是永久的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Intereconomics》 |2002年第1期|19-27|共9页
  • 作者

    Floris Vogelaar;

  • 作者单位

    the Europa Instituut of the Law Faculty of the University of Amsterdam;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号