...
首页> 外文期刊>Interiors: design, architecture and culture >Interiorist interventions and archival strategies: Contemporary terms for museums and creative practitioners
【24h】

Interiorist interventions and archival strategies: Contemporary terms for museums and creative practitioners

机译:内心干预措施和档案策略:博物馆和创意从业者的当代术语

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The contested interior space of the museum and its artifacts are receiving due attention. Museum objectors are altering content, examining unacknowledged assumptions and biases, and developing new ways of seeing and experiencing that will act as new models for critical, creative discourse. Museum objectors range from entire countries (notably Greece, which has been asking the British Museum to return the marble gods of the Parthenon since 1833), to community groups and creative practitioners. A prime example of the latter type of museum objector was Marcel Duchamp. His interiorist interventions of the 1930s and 1940s set the tone for creative practice within the notion of inferiority, informed exhibition display and experience, and expanded museum discourse. This paper proposes that Marcel Duchamp extended his creative artistic practice into the field of interior design to subvert critical discourse on authoritarian aesthetics and display. Within this context of critical reflection, the museum as an artistic medium is also fast becoming an accepted methodology of creative practice. To examine this practical, creative work, we first draw on Jacques Derrida's theoretical discussion about the concept of 'the archive,' to acknowledge the language of interiority and to focus on the 'curated interior' by juxtaposing the domestic and institutional interior and the notion of topology as a form of creative methodology. As a stepping-off-point, we will explore Marcel Duchamp's conceptual nuances of the interior, specifically his La Boite-en-valise, as a masterful blending of the archive (collection), the melding of creative disciplines, and commentary on the museum practices. We will then examine the challenges faced by two American and one Canadian museums' exhibitions in the 1980s, followed by a review of more recent works highlighting progressive change within these museums. The works by Spring Hurlbut in 2001 and Kent Monkman and Wangechi Mutu in 2019 illustrate evolving discussions about the use of creative practitioners working with museum collections and interiors. As the landscape of the curated interior within the institutional setting (museum) has changed, it is a crucial time to take stock of the different possibilities when addressing the spaces between the memories of the archive: what is remembered, how it was/is remembered? This new methodology of museum as artistic medium is substantially expanding modern critical discourse on the interiority and the archive.
机译:博物馆的竞争内部空间及其文物正在接受适当的关注。博物馆官员正在改变内容,检查未经认证的假设和偏见,并开发新的观看和体验方式,这将充当批判性创造性话语的新模式。博物馆官员从整个国家/地区(特别是希腊,这一直要求大英博物馆自1833年以来返回帕台农神庙的大理石神),到社区团体和创意从业者。后一型博物馆对象的主要例子是Marcel Duchamp。 20世纪30年代和20世纪40年代的内部主持人干预措施为自卑,知情展览展示和经验的概念,以及扩大博物馆话语中的创意实践。本文提出了Marcel Duchamp将他创造性的艺术实践扩展到室内设计领域,以颠覆关于专制美学和展示的危急话语。在这种关键反思的背景下,博物馆作为艺术媒介也很快成为创意实践的接受方法。为了审查这种实用,创造性的工作,我们首先借鉴Jacques Derrida关于“档案”概念的理论讨论,以承认内部性语言,并通过并列国内和制度内部和概念来关注“策划内部”拓扑作为一种创造性方法的形式。作为一个逐步关键,我们将探索Marcel Duchamp的内部的概念细微差别,特别是他的La Boite-an Valise,作为档案(集合),创造性学科的融合和博物馆评论的统一混合实践。然后,我们将在20世纪80年代审查两名美国和一枚加拿大博物馆展览所面临的挑战,随后对这些博物馆内的逐步变化突出了更新的工作。 2019年2001年春伦·赫尔宾和肯特·莫克曼的作品说明了关于使用创意从业者与博物馆收藏和内部合作的不断发展的讨论。随着机构环境中的策划内部的景观(博物馆)已经改变,这是在解决档案回忆之间的空间时占用不同可能性的重要时间:记住的是什么,如何/被记住还是这种新的博物馆方法是艺术媒介的新方法在内尚和档案中大大扩大了现代关键话语。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号