• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Advances in Economic Research >Schumpeter's Split Between 'Pure' Economics and Institutional Economics: Why Methodological Individualism Was Not Fully Considered
【24h】

Schumpeter's Split Between 'Pure' Economics and Institutional Economics: Why Methodological Individualism Was Not Fully Considered

机译：熊彼特在“纯粹”经济学和制度经济学之间的分歧：为什么没有充分考虑方法论上的个人主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

While Joseph A. Schumpeter is classified as a pioneer of evolutionary economics in a wide sense and of entrepreneurship and innovation management in a narrower sense, Schumpeter is less known for his contributions in the area of scientific methodology and history of science. The paper deals with methodological premises in Schumpeter’s scientific positioning. In 1908, in his Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie , Schumpeter developed and pioneered his methodological individualism which is very much acknowledged. However, comparing these early positions with methodological writings in his History of Economic Analysis (1954) shows that he has not really shifted from methodological individualism to an institutional perspective that addresses the academic interplay and sees economic action rooted in historical predispositions, paths and social constraints.
机译：约瑟夫·熊彼特在广义上被认为是进化经济学的先驱，在狭义上被认为是企业家精神和创新管理的先驱，而熊彼特却因其在科学方法论和科学史上的贡献而闻名。该论文探讨了熊彼特科学定位中的方法论前提。 1908年，熊彼特（Schumpeter）在他的《国民经济理论》（Das Wesen und Hauptinhalt der theNationalökonomie）中发展并开创了他的方法论个人主义，这一点得到了广泛认可。但是，将这些早期立场与《经济分析史》（1954年）中的方法论著作进行比较表明，他并没有真正从方法论个人主义转向研究学术相互作用并认为经济行为源于历史倾向，路径和社会约束的制度观点。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号