首页> 外文期刊>International Feminist Journal of Politics >Eco/Feminism, Non-Violence and the Future of Feminism
【24h】

Eco/Feminism, Non-Violence and the Future of Feminism

机译:生态/女权主义,非暴力与女权主义的未来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article turns to an eco/feminist peace camp of the early 1990s in order to revisit the often passionate and troubled debates in feminism about pacifism, non-violence, maternalism and essentialism. Many readings of feminist peace activism, and eco/feminism, have collapsed a complicated politics into simple manifestations of maternalism, while at the same time reducing maternalism to essentialism. In this process essentialism has been invoked to disavow feminist peace activism and eco/feminist activism. Yet the critique of essentialism has now been the subject of much reflection by feminists. Rather than ascribing the category of 'essentialism', genealogical approaches attend to how the categories of 'essentialism' and 'woman' are invoked and to what ends. Such approaches thereby open up possibilities for understanding ecofeminist activism beyond essentialism. While an eco/feminist peace camp may appear an archetypal site for the re-inscription and repetition of essentialism, I suggest that without returning to such sites it will remain impossible to go beyond essentialism. Through a genealogical examination of contestations over the meanings and practice of eco/feminism at the camp, I understand this late-twentieth century peace camp, not as a quaint throwback to the disavowed activism of the 1970s and 1980s, but as a site through which the future of eco/feminist politics was, and can be, re-imagined.
机译:本文转向1990年代初的生态/女权和平阵营,以重新审视女权主义中关于和平主义,非暴力,母体主义和本质主义的经常充满激情和麻烦的辩论。对女权主义和平行动主义和生态/女权主义的许多解读,已使复杂的政治崩溃为母体主义的简单表现,同时又将母体主义简化为本质主义。在这一过程中,本质主义被用来否认女权主义和平行动主义和生态/女权主义行动主义。然而,对本质主义的批判现在已经成为女权主义者反思的主题。谱系学方法没有提到“本质主义”的范畴,而是关注“本质主义”和“女人”的范畴是如何被调用的以及达到什么目的。因此,这些方法为理解超越本质主义的生态女性主义行动打开了可能性。虽然一个生态/女权和平营可能是重新登记和重复本质主义的原型场所,但我建议,如果不回到这些场所,将不可能超越本质主义。通过对营地中生态/女权主义的含义和实践的争论进行家谱检查,我了解了这个20世纪后期的和平营地,这并不是对1970年代和1980年代被否决的激进主义的古怪退缩,而是作为一个生态/女性主义政治的未来曾经而且可以被重新想象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号