...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Insolvency Review >Harmonisation of European Insolvency Law and the Need to Tackle Two Common Problems: Common Pool and Anticommons
【24h】

Harmonisation of European Insolvency Law and the Need to Tackle Two Common Problems: Common Pool and Anticommons

机译：协调欧洲破产法和解决两个常见问题的需要：共同财产池和反共通

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Insolvency law has finally become a field of law for which harmonisation at a European level is considered both important and feasible. In deciding upon the content of such harmonised rules, there will need to be a common understanding about the goals of insolvency law and, therefore, a European debate on bankruptcy theory. Bankruptcy theory, and most notably the influential creditors' bargain theory, has long viewed insolvency law as a set of rules for overcoming common pool problems. Bankruptcy theory thus far has almost completely overlooked anticommons problems. Anticommons present themselves in a situation in which there are several owners or entitled parties, and each of the parties has it within its power to block the use by others. Should anticommons behaviour in insolvency procedures go unchecked, creditors as a whole will be harmed. Insolvency is a collective process, and this process may not be sabotaged by a single party. Four typical insolvency issues, each identified by INSOL Europe as a candidate for harmonisation at a European level, are discussed, analysing them in terms of common pool problems and anticommons: preferences, reorganisation/ composition plans, claim validation and insolvency of a group of companies.
机译：破产法终于成为法律领域，在欧洲，协调统一被认为既重要又可行。在确定此类统一规则的内容时，需要对破产法的目标有一个共同的理解，因此，需要欧洲就破产理论进行辩论。破产理论，尤其是有影响力的债权人的讨价还价理论，长期以来一直将破产法视为解决共同池问题的一组规则。到目前为止，破产理论几乎完全忽略了反共性问题。在存在多个所有者或有权当事方，并且每个当事方都有能力阻止其他人使用的情况下，反公共关系会出现。如果不限制破产程序中的反共行为，则整个债权人将受到损害。破产是一个集体过程，这一过程可能不会被单方破坏。讨论了四个典型的破产问题，每个问题都被INSOL Europe确定为在欧洲范围内进行统一的候选者，并根据常见的合并问题和反常见问题对其进行了分析：偏好，重组/组成计划，索赔确认和一组公司的破产。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Insolvency Review》 |2012年第2期|p.67-83|共17页
  • 作者

    Rolef J. de Weijs;

  • 作者单位

    University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Office of HouthoffBuruma, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号