• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling >Scholarly Productivity of Editorial Board Members of Three American Counseling and Counseling Psychology Journals
【24h】

Scholarly Productivity of Editorial Board Members of Three American Counseling and Counseling Psychology Journals

机译：三种美国心理咨询心理学期刊编辑委员会成员的学术生产力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The scholarly journals in professional and scientific fields serve the function of communicating new knowledge and informed discourse on the major issues affecting the field of counseling, and editorial board members (EBMs) serve as gatekeepers of what information will be communicated. The ability of EBMs to make sound judgments directly affects the quality of research and scholarship published. This study analyzed one important EBM qualification, the scholarly productivity of the editorial board members of three major American counseling journals (The Counseling Psychologist [TCP], the Journal of Counseling Psychology [JCP], and the Journal of Counseling and Development [JCD]). An analysis of the productivity rates of editorial board members on these journals was conducted using the PsycINFO database. The results indicated that editorial board members of JCP have significantly more experience publishing than members of TCP and JCD. The differential publication rates of editorial board members suggest that these three journals place different emphasis on scholarly productivity as part of their selection criteria for editorial board membership and may reflect that the three journals have different missions and serve different clientele. These findings have implications, not only for the profession of counseling in the United States, but also for the international counseling community.
机译：专业和科学领域的学术期刊具有传播新知识和关于影响咨询领域的重大问题的知情论述的功能，而编辑委员会成员（EBM）则是将传达哪些信息的守门人。循证医学做出正确判断的能力直接影响发表的研究和奖学金的质量。这项研究分析了一项重要的EBM资格，美国三大主要咨询期刊（咨询心理学家[TCP]，《咨询心理学杂志》 [JCP]和《咨询与发展杂志》 [JCD]）的编辑效率。 。使用PsycINFO数据库对这些期刊上的编辑委员会成员的生产率进行了分析。结果表明，JCP编辑委员会成员比TCP和JCD成员拥有更多的出版经验。编辑委员会成员的不同发表率表明，这三种期刊对学术生产力的重视程度不同，这是它们作为编辑委员会成员选择标准的一部分，并且可能反映出这三种期刊具有不同的使命并服务于不同的客户。这些发现不仅对美国的咨询业有影响，而且对国际咨询界也有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号