• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Advances in Management Science >Research on Dynamic Change of China's Regional Innovation Efficiency-Based on Malmquist Index
【24h】

Research on Dynamic Change of China's Regional Innovation Efficiency-Based on Malmquist Index

机译：基于Malmquist指数的中国区域创新效率动态变化研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In constructing the panel data of 30 provinces from 1998 to 2010, this paper constructs provincial innovation activities in the production frontier based on Malmquist Index and DEA Model, decomposing the innovation efficiency growth into technological progress and technical efficiency change. The paper also investigates regional innovation sources of growth and differentiation. The results show that: (1) The innovation TFP growth not only comes from technological progress, but also from technical efficiency, and the contribution of technical efficiency is slightly greater than that of technological progress from 1998 to 2010. Technology efficiency growth is mainly caused by the growth of pure technical efficiency, in spite of the decline of scale efficiency. (2) The innovation TFP growth is relatively stable after 2000, except for a decline during 2003-2005. The technology efficiency change reached the top in 2002 and had grown steadily after that. The technology progress change always grows steadily except for a decline in 2002. (3) The TFP growth annually of the East, Middle and West is 1.019, 1.008 and 1.015 respectively. There exists gap between Eastern and Mid-Western, and the gap between the Middle and Eastern is bigger than the Western and Eastern. The TFP growth of eastern region mainly comes from technological progress, while the TFP growth of central and western mainly comes from technical efficiency.
机译：在构建1998年至2010年30个省的面板数据时，本文基于马尔姆奎斯特指数和DEA模型构建了生产前沿的省级创新活动，将创新效率的增长分解为技术进步和技术效率变化。本文还研究了增长和分化的区域创新来源。结果表明：（1）创新性全要素生产率的增长不仅来自技术进步，而且来自技术效率，其技术效率的贡献比1998年至2010年的技术进步略大。技术效率增长的主要原因是尽管规模效率有所下降，但纯技术效率的增长仍然可以实现。 （2）2000年以后，创新性全要素生产率的增长相对稳定，但2003-2005年期间有所下降。技术效率变化在2002年达到顶峰，此后稳步增长。除2002年有所下降外，技术进步的变化一直稳定增长。（3）东部，中部和西部的TFP每年增长分别为1.019、1.008和1.015。东部与中西部之间存在差距，并且中东与东部之间的差距大于西部与东部。东部地区的全要素生产率增长主要来自技术进步，而中西部的全要素生产率增长主要来自技术效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号