Supervisory control for deadlock-free resource allocation has been an active area of manufacturing systems research. To date, most work assumes that allocated resources do not fail. Little research has addressed allocating resources that may fail. In our previous work (Lawley, M., 200212. Lawley , M. 2002 . Control of deadlock and blocking for production systems with unreliable resources . International Journal of Production Research , 40 ( 17 ) : 4563 - 4582 . [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]View all references. Control of deadlock and blocking for production systems with unreliable resources. International Journal of Production Research, 40 (17), 4563-4582; Lawley, M. and Sulistyono, W., 200217. Lawley , M. and Sulistyono , W. 2002 . Robust supervisory control policies for manufacturing systems with unreliable resources . IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation , 18 ( 3 ) : 346 - 359 . [CrossRef]View all references. Robust supervisory control policies for manufacturing systems with unreliable resources. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 18 (3), 346-359), we assumed a single unreliable resource and developed supervisory controllers to ensure robust deadlock-free operation in the event of resource failure. In this article, we assume that several unreliable resources may fail simultaneously. In this case, the controller must guarantee that a set of resource failures does not propagate through blocking to stall other portions of the system. That is, it must ensure that every part type not requiring any of the failed resources should continue to produce smoothly without disruption. To do this, the controller must constrain the system to states that serve as feasible initial states for (i) a reduced system when resource failures occur and (ii) an upgraded system when failed resources are repaired. We develop the properties that such a controller must possess and then develop supervisory controllers that satisfy these properties.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdeadlock avoidance, robust supervisory control, flexible manufacturing systemsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2011.552526
展开▼
机译：无死锁资源分配的监督控制一直是制造系统研究的活跃领域。迄今为止，大多数工作都假定分配的资源不会失败。很少有研究解决分配可能失败的资源。在我们之前的工作中（Lawley，M.，200212。Lawley，M。2002。对资源不可靠的生产系统的死锁和阻塞进行控制。《国际生产研究》，40（17）：4563-4582。[Taylor＆Francis Online ]，[Web of Science®]查看所有参考资料，控制资源不可靠的生产系统的死锁和阻塞，International Journal of Production Research，40（17），4563-4582； Lawley，M.和Sulistyono，W.，200217 。Lawley，M.和Sulistyono，W. 2002.具有不可靠资源的制造系统的鲁棒监督控制策略。IEEE机器人与自动化学报，18（3）：346-359。[CrossRef]查看所有参考。鲁棒监督控制策略针对具有不可靠资源的制造系统（IEEE机器人与自动化交易，第18卷第3期，第346-359页），我们假定了一个不可靠的资源，并开发了监督控制器，以确保在出现资源f的情况下实现可靠的无死锁操作痛在本文中，我们假设几个不可靠的资源可能同时失败。在这种情况下，控制器必须保证不会通过阻塞传播一组资源故障，从而使系统的其他部分停滞不前。也就是说，它必须确保不需要任何故障资源的每种零件类型都应继续平稳生产而不中断。为此，控制器必须将系统限制为可作为初始状态的状态，以便（i）发生资源故障时还原系统，以及（ii）修复故障资源时升级系统。我们开发了此类控制器必须具备的属性，然后开发出满足这些属性的监督控制器。查看全文下载全文避免死锁，强大的监督控制，灵活的制造系统相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，美味，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2011.552526
展开▼
