• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Computer Processing of Oriental Languages >Comparison between Ad-hoc Retrieval and Filtering Retrieval Using Arabic Documents
【24h】

Comparison between Ad-hoc Retrieval and Filtering Retrieval Using Arabic Documents

机译：临时检索和使用阿拉伯文档进行过滤检索的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The objective of this research is to study the process of examining documents by computing comparisons between the representation of the information need (the queries) and the representations of the documents. Also, we will automate the process of representing information needs as user profiles by computing the comparison between the user profile and the representations of the documents. We consider an automated process to be successful when it produces results similar to those produced by human comparison of the documents themselves with actual information need. Thus, we will compare ad-hoc retrieval and filtering retrieval tasks and examine the differences between them in terms of the information retrieval process. We have selected 242 Arabic abstracts that were used by Hmeidi. All these abstracts involve computer science and information systems. We have also designed and built a system to compare two different retrieval tasks: ad-hoc retrieval and filtering retrieval. Here, we define ad-hoc and filtering retrieval systems and illustrate the development strategy for each one. We compare the two tasks on the basis of recall/precision evaluation, system usability, domain search, ranking, construction complexity, and methodology. From this experiment, we conclude that ad-hoc retrieval gives better performance than filtering retrieval. We also consider the advantages of using filtering services in the information retrieval process.
机译：这项研究的目的是通过计算信息需求（查询）的表示形式和文档表示形式之间的比较来研究检查文档的过程。此外，我们将通过计算用户个人资料和文档表示之间的比较，自动将信息需求表示为用户个人资料的过程。当自动化过程产生的结果与人工比较文档本身与实际信息需求所产生的结果相似时，我们认为该过程是成功的。因此，我们将比较即席检索和过滤检索任务，并根据信息检索过程检查它们之间的差异。我们选择了242个Hmeidi使用的阿拉伯文摘要。所有这些摘要都涉及计算机科学和信息系统。我们还设计并构建了一个系统来比较两个不同的检索任务：即席检索和过滤检索。在这里，我们定义了即席和过滤检索系统，并说明了每种检索系统的开发策略。我们在召回/精确度评估，系统可用性，域搜索，排名，构造复杂度和方法学的基础上比较了两个任务。从该实验中，我们得出结论，即席检索比过滤检索具有更好的性能。我们还考虑了在信息检索过程中使用过滤服务的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号