...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Constituency of peoples in the constitutional system of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Chasing fair solutions
【24h】

Constituency of peoples in the constitutional system of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Chasing fair solutions

机译：波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那宪法体系中人民的选区：追求公正的解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The constituency of peoples as a collective political right of ethnic communities in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosnians, Serbs, and Croats) was provided as a constitutional category by the Washington and Dayton Peace Agreements. On the one hand, institutional guarantees for equal status of ethnic groups, which make the essence of constituency, can indeed help to decrease the insecurity and tensions among them and secure the removal of obstacles during the distribution of political power. On the other hand, it is difficult to foresee the consequences of institutionalized ethnic equality on the individual equality of the members of the different groups. In that sense, there is a real risk of identification of the collective ethnic identity with individual identity, and limitation of individual rights to collective political rights of ethnic groups, which is the case in Bosnia and Herzegovina in post-Dayton period. By its decision in the Sejdic-Finci case, the European Court of Human Rights confirmed that Bosnia and Herzegovina, taking into account all its specificity, should find a "lucky" combination of civil and ethnic constitutional model.
机译：华盛顿和《代顿和平协定》将人民选区作为波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那各民族（波斯尼亚人，塞族人和克罗地亚人）的集体政治权利作为宪法类别。一方面，作为选民本质的，对族裔平等地位的制度保障确实可以帮助减少族裔之间的不安全感和紧张局势，并确保消除政治权力分配过程中的障碍。另一方面，很难预见制度化种族平等对不同群体成员个人平等的影响。从这种意义上讲，存在将集体种族身份与个人身份相结合的现实风险，并将个人权利限制在族裔群体的集体政治权利中，这在代顿后时期的波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那就是这种情况。欧洲人权法院在对塞伊迪奇-芬奇案的判决中确认，波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那考虑到其所有特殊性，应找到一种“幸运的”公民和族裔宪法模式的结合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号