...
【24h】

Editorial

机译:社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

My NYU colleague, Ronald Dworkin, passed away on February 13th, 2013. He was not a comparativist in the classical sense of the word - but he was in the sense that we at I.CON try to cultivate. His conceptual and theoretical reach transcended the American legal system and was relevant well beyond its shores. His commitment to understanding other legal systems, but especially the constitutional and public law sensibilities informed by other systems, was deep, as evidenced by his years at Oxford and later at University College, London. His life, divided between Europe and the US, with frequent visits to the farthest jurisdictions, encapsulates that non-parochial approach. Our view of the discipline includes, of course, the careful comparison, doctrinal and conceptual, of law and legal institutions in different countries. But it also embraces reflection, research and writing that goes to the fundamentals of public law and becomes thus relevant beyond traditional boundaries.
机译:我的纽约大学同事罗纳德·德沃金(Ronald Dworkin)于2013年2月13日去世。他不是古典意义上的比较主义者,但他是I.CON努力培养的意义。他在概念和理论上的影响力超越了美国法律体系,与美国法律体系息息相关。他在牛津大学和伦敦大学学院的工作证明了他对理解其他法律制度,特别是其他制度对宪法和公法敏感性的承诺的深刻体现。他的生活遍布欧洲和美国,并经常访问最远的司法管辖区,这体现了这种非狭och的态度。当然,我们对学科的看法包括在不同国家对法律和法律制度进行仔细的比较,包括理论和概念上的比较。但是,它也包含反思,研究和写作,这些反思,研究和写作涉及公法的基础,因此在传统范围之外具有相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号