...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Transforming 'fairness' as a ground of judicial review in Hong Kong
【24h】

Transforming 'fairness' as a ground of judicial review in Hong Kong

机译：将“公平”转变为香港司法审查的依据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper evaluates the recent development of "fairness" as a ground of judicial review by the courts in Hong Kong. This newly developed ground of fairness is significantly more far-reaching than "procedural fairness" and other existing uses of fairness in judicial review. Key innovations include: (a) the courts' review of systemic problems with decision-making processes; (b) the extension of the courts' review of the fairness of such processes beyond the traditional focus on, for example, the right to a hearing; and (c) the introduction of a sliding scale of review with stronger or "anxious" scrutiny of decision-making processes. The paper evaluates the need for these innovations, noting an absence of a conscious internalization of procedural standards in decision making at the executive level. The paper concludes that the ground of fairness, therefore, is a positive development of administrative law. However, in addition to the usual risk of over-judicialization of administrative process, there is a risk that the recently developed ground is too hard-edged as currently formulated. The paper, therefore, proposes the introduction of a justificatory and balancing component to its usage, similar to that used in the context of proportionality. It also proposes a clarification of the kinds of situations that would trigger the use of this stronger ground of fairness.
机译：本文评估“公平”的最新发展，以此作为香港法院进行司法审查的依据。这种新近发展的公平基础远比“程序公平”和司法审查中其他现有的公平范围更为广泛。关键的创新包括：（a）法院对具有决策程序的系统性问题的审查； （b）将法院对这类程序的公正性的审查范围扩大到传统上的重点以外，例如，听证权； （c）引入滑动式的审查量表，对决策过程进行更严格或“焦虑”的审查。本文评估了对这些创新的需求，并指出在行政级别的决策中缺乏对程序标准的自觉内部化。本文得出结论，因此，公平的基础是行政法的积极发展。但是，除了通常存在行政程序司法过度化的风险外，还有一种风险是，按照目前的规定，最近发展的理由过于边缘化。因此，本文建议在其用法中引入辩护和平衡成分，类似于在比例环境中使用的成分。它还建议对可能触发使用这种更强的公平基础的情况进行澄清。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号