...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >What comparativism tells us about originalism
【24h】

What comparativism tells us about originalism

机译：比较主义告诉我们关于原始主义的东西

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Defended as a method of constitutional interpretation, originalism is typically thought to reflect uniquely American anxieties about the judicial expansion of rights and the place of popular constitutional culture in judicial review. As such, it has appeared to be of little general interest to constitutional scholars. This paper uses comparative constitutional law to challenge that assumption. Australian constitutionalism lacks the key features thought to make the view distinctively American and yet, the paper argues, originalism not only thrives in Australia but has a firmer foundation in the Australian constitutional system. This has important implications for the application of comparativism to constitutional theory beyond the debate about originalism: the fact that theorists have largely overlooked the possibility that the American constitutional system is not the best fit for originalist interpretation helps show how assumptions grounded in American debates about judicial activism have come to define the aims of interpretive theory.
机译：作为一种宪法解释的方法，原始主义通常被认为反映了美国对权利的司法扩张和大众宪法文化在司法审查中的地位的焦虑。因此，对于宪政学者来说似乎没有什么大的兴趣。本文使用比较宪法来挑战这一假设。澳大利亚宪政主义缺乏被认为可以使美国观点与众不同的关键特征，然而，本文认为，独创主义不仅在澳大利亚盛行，而且在澳大利亚宪政体系中拥有更牢固的基础。这对将比较主义运用于宪法理论具有重要意义，而不仅仅是关于原始主义的辩论：理论家在很大程度上忽视了美国宪法制度并非最适合原始主义解释的可能性这一事实有助于说明如何基于美国有关司法辩论的假设活动主义已经定义了解释理论的目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号