...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Dignity and sexuality: Claims on dignity in transnational debates over abortion and same-sex marriage
【24h】

Dignity and sexuality: Claims on dignity in transnational debates over abortion and same-sex marriage

机译：尊严与性：关于堕胎和同性婚姻的跨国辩论中关于尊严的主张

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Dignity's meaning is famously contested. This essay explores competing claims on dignity in late twentieth-century debates over abortion and in the first decisions on the constitutionality of abortion legislation that these debates prompted. Advocates and judges appealed to dignity to vindicate autonomy, to vindicate equality, and to express respect for the value of life itself. Appeals to these distinct conceptions of dignity are now appearing in debates over the regulation of same-sex relations. Analyzed with attention to competing claims on dignity, we can see that in the debate over same-sex relations, as in the debate over abortion, a crucial question recurs: Do laws that restrict non-procreative sexuality violate or vindicate human dignity? Agonists who hold fundamentally different views about sexuality share an allegiance to dignity, enough to fight for the authority to establish dignity's meaning in debates over sexual freedom. Today, as in the 1970s, dignity's meaning is being forged in cross-borders conflict over dignity's sex.
机译：尊严的含义受到争议。本文探讨了二十世纪晚期有关堕胎的辩论以及在这些辩论引起的关于堕胎立法是否合宪的第一项决定中有关尊严的相互竞争的主张。提倡者和法官呼吁尊严维护自治，维护平等并表达对生命本身价值的尊重。在有关同性关系的规定的辩论中，现在出现了对这些不同尊严概念的呼吁。在关注竞争性尊严主张的分析中，我们可以看到，在关于同性关系的辩论中，就像在关于堕胎的辩论中一样，出现了一个关键问题：限制非强制性性的法律是否违反或维护了人的尊严？对性欲持有根本不同意见的激动剂对尊严的忠诚，足以在有关性自由的辩论中争取确立尊严含义的权威。如今，与1970年代一样，尊严的含义正在因尊严的性别而跨界冲突中得以确立。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号